Archive for the ‘Advertising’ Category

Marketing is Dead

Well actually it’s not; marketing is more powerful than ever these days, as the latest Old Spice campaign can attest! But, who started this whole viral, user-generated, guerilla, social marketing concept anyways? Lately people have been saying it was the Grateful Dead.

Well actually it’s not; marketing is more powerful than ever these days, as the latest Old Spice campaign can attest! But, who started this whole viral, user-generated, guerilla, social marketing concept anyways? Lately people have been saying it was the Grateful Dead.

Unfortunately, I never became a Deadhead. But, I did admire the stuffed animal Dead Bears during trips to Newbury Comics, with my dad and brother, back in my middle-school days, and even bought a purple-and-green one. Little did I know, I too was part of their strategy. The CEO of HubSpot recently co-authored a book entitled “Marketing Strategies of the Grateful Dead,” which was reviewed in the Boston Globe last week.

They write that the band cultivated a loyal following by giving things away — letting people record their concerts and freely distribute music, going around their promotions department and building their own mailing list, and even letting people buy premium tickets by mail (what, mail? yeah in the “olden days” you had to get tickets right at the box office, so this was pretty cool). They also encouraged “artisans” to “co-opt the band’s fan base by selling compatible, often handmade, products at performances,” says the Globe article, hence my Dead Bear. 

To add to the Dead “buzz,” an article in the March issue of The Atlantic talks about how it was the Dead’s lyricist, John Perry Barlow, who made this connection way back in 1994, in Wired Magazine, saying that “the best way to raise demand for your product is to give it away.”  He went on to say in the Atlantic article “if I give my song away to 20 people, and they give it to 20 people, pretty soon everybody knows me, and my value as a creator is dramatically enhanced.” That’s a pretty good Customer Value Proposition if you ask me!

In terms of connecting with their market and creating loyal customers, the free model worked pretty well for the Dead. But, how is it working today for other companies? Well, consider how we are all marketed to online.  About five minutes ago, I got an email from Virgin America saying that if I buy a plane ticket in the next 24 hours they will donate $5 from my purchase, and for every ticket sale, to an educational cause. Wait, I have to pay? Well, I think it’s pretty popular because I just clicked on the link and I’m still waiting for the page to load. Or, when I followed one of my favorite clothing companies on Twitter and they sent me a 25-percent-off coupon; thanks guys! While I’m not getting “free” stuff, I already know which dress I’m buying with the coupon, so I’d say the strategy is working pretty well!

What do you think? Can companies create brand loyalty by giving things away? Or is the Dead’s strategy just going to Hell in a Bucket?

3 Responses to “Marketing is Dead”

  1. Barry Silverstein says:

    One good contemporary example might be Apple and its free apps. Of course the Apple devices are not cheap, but they build a lot of brand loyalty with the downloadable apps., many of which are free.
    Taking it a step further, Google has done pretty well with free search.
    Couple of current examples where companies build value and loyalty through “free” services to consumers.
    Barry

  2. Jeff Dale says:

    Great post Charlotte! My feeling is that free marketing is a great way to gain visibility and “share of mind”, but often fails at gaining “share of wallet”. A quick example from my experience:

    I manage marketing efforts for two local dance studios. I produce videos of various performances by the dancers and give free DVDs and video links away to students. This added value increases loyalty among customers. It also builds visibility as these students share the videos with their friends and family.

    On the other hand, we tried giving away a free month of dance classes to anyone who refers a new student (an attempt to increase enrollment). We distributed this info on a certificate to over 300 active students, and not one redeemed it!

  3. Aviva says:

    The Dead’s strategy is definitely alive and well today, even in the music industry. Amanda Palmer, a Boston-based solo artist and member of the Dresden Dolls, is notorious for reaching out directly to her fans and being extremely generous with her content – and her fan base is nothing if not loyal.

    Jeff, I think the key to making these promotions do help you grab that share of wallet is looking at your business model and figuring out how you can use free or discounted services to push your high margin, or highest demand, products, while delighting the customer will extras. So for example, concert ticket sales might have been the top priority for the Grateful Dead, and their customers essentially acted like marketing agents for ticket sales.

    Really interesting post, love the blog!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Can McDonald’s Pull Off “Local”?

Local is all the rage right now. Everywhere I turn, I see restaurants and stores pitching their food as locally grown and sold. I think this is pretty fantastic (though it certainly can get out of hand—I recently saw a “locally raised and organically fed filet of rabbit with a side of natural root of summer squash and a home-grown fat of pig garnish”), so I was especially intrigued when I saw that McDonald’s has recently launched a “locally sourced” food campaign in Washington state.

Local is all the rage right now. Everywhere I turn, I see restaurants and stores pitching their food as locally grown and sold. I think this is pretty fantastic (though it certainly can get out of hand—I recently saw a “locally raised and organically fed filet of rabbit with a side of natural root of summer squash and a home-grown fat of pig garnish”), so I was especially intrigued when I saw that McDonald’s has recently launched a “locally sourced” food campaign in Washington state.

The premise is simple—McDonald’s claims that 95 percent of the fries and Filet-O-Fish sandwiches and 88 percent of its apples served in Washington come directly from within the state. These are pretty interesting statistics, especially because McDonald’s is seen by many as a big bad corporation—the antithesis of local. If you take a look at the microsite for the campaign, you can see the full list of specific products, and where they come from in Washington. Nifty stuff, and, if nothing else, they’re offering a free medium fries just for checking out the site. You can bring that one right to your nearest Washington McDonald’s for about 28 free fries from Washington, and 2 from god knows where else.

The question is—does a big company going local mean anything to you? If you heard that your local McDonald’s used locally sourced ingredients, would you be more likely to succumb to your Big Mac cravings? Or, do you think this campaign, with its varying “participation and duration” clause, is a sham to “localwash” consumers? If it’s successful, should McDonald’s try to expand the idea throughout the country? You tell us!

2 Responses to “Can McDonald’s Pull Off “Local”?”

  1. Nina Kentsis says:

    This is interesting because many large companies are trying to do this, including Wal-Mart. While I don’t eat at McDonald’s, and I’m not sure how many people like me would be swayed to do so because of a campaign like this–or even how many regular customers care about this kind of information–I think it’s a good thing. Companies like this have the power to move markets and to change the way we eat. For example, when Starbucks decided it didn’t want the milk that it served to have rBGH, I’m sure it had an effect on milk production in this country because Starbucks buys so much milk.

  2. Geri Koeppel says:

    I don’t care if McDonald’s grows their own food in their parking lots or on their roofs; I won’t eat it because it’s uber-processed and full of chemicals. They are missing the point of eating locally and seasonally, and attempting to pander to a demographic that probably never will be customers anyway. Or, more likely, they’re giving current customers a way to justify their bad eating habits, which they don’t need — folks who eat fast food will eat it no matter what. Either way, I think it’s wrong-headed.

Leave a Reply

Read more

A Renewed Call for Creativity

In their latest issue, AdAge provides a summary of a UK report stating that award-winning advertising has more effective in-market results because it engages the consumer and creates real buzz for the brand.

In their latest issue, AdAge provides a summary of a UK report stating that award-winning advertising has more effective in-market results because it engages the consumer and creates real buzz for the brand.

The argument about advertising creativity is not new, but it has taken on renewed urgency as creative budgets are slashed and making the sale for any brand is tougher than ever due to the global recession.  The advertising and communication business has been focused on survival, cost-reduction and chasing digital expertise.  At the same time, many clients have been focused on short-term earnings, staff reductions and giving procurement more control in the creative process.  If it wasn’t so destructive it would seem comical.

The results haven’t been pretty.  Recycled campaigns from years ago, advertising that focuses on the pure sell vs. engagement and brand-building and agency firings/changes that make your head spin.

On top of this, creative research is stuck in a time warp.  Focus groups, persuasion-driven copy-testing and quantitative studies suck the life out of creative people—and ultimately the creative product itself.

It’s time for the communication business to take a collective breath, and focus on building brands in new and creative ways.

It’s time to find ways to inspire creative people who are uniquely capable of inspiring consumers.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Old Spice’s “Man Your Man Could Smell Like” Campaign is Fantastic

Old Spice has been getting all sorts of praise for its “Man your man could smell like” advertising campaign. The premise is simple: jacked dude explains to women that if their men used Old Spice, they could smell like him—while all the while he is shirtless doing amazing feats (and riding horses… backwards). It’s cracked me up from the start and is absolutely brilliant in its absurdity. Understandably, the ads were instantly viral.

Old Spice has been getting all sorts of praise for its “Man your man could smell like” advertising campaign. The premise is simple: jacked dude explains to women that if their men used Old Spice, they could smell like him—while all the while he is shirtless doing amazing feats (and riding horses… backwards). It’s cracked me up from the start and is absolutely brilliant in its absurdity. Understandably, the ads were instantly viral.

With their new series of ads though, they’ve taken brand participation to a new level. The Old Spice twitter handle is written in the “voice” of the actor, which is funny and is a great way to make the brand accessible. But tweeting isn’t all—the company is also taking the time to individually respond to “@OldSpice” tweets with commercial-style video responses.

So when Kevin Rose, the founder of Digg.com tweeted “i’m considering buying old spice body wash just so they keep making these epic commercials – http://bit.ly/K87jz” while also complaining about a fever in a later tweet, Old Spice guy responded with this:

Absolutely love it. Now, I may not be a marketing guru, but I do think I know funny. And this, dear readers, is funny. Funny things get passed around and talked about. And that, I’m pretty sure, is marketing gold.

So what do you think: Is this an effective campaign? Do you think that as brands look to engage deeper and deeper with their customers we will be seeing more of this direct participation? Or, even more importantly, does a funny, viral campaign even affect sales? Will Old Spice be able to measure the effectiveness of this campaign?  Let us know what you think in the comments!

5 Responses to “Old Spice’s “Man Your Man Could Smell Like” Campaign is Fantastic”

  1. The thing that makes this advertising campaign so effective is it’s just ludicrously funny, and because no one knows Mustafa’s name (and he’s been signed as “talent” to NBC for a series to be developed), everyone keeps calling him “The Old Spice guy”. Brand, brand, brand.

  2. Lou Tamposi says:

    Steffani–I completely agree. If nothing else, this keeps the Old Spice brand buzzing. Do you think Mustafa is so linked to Old Spice that if and when NBC develops a series around him it will generate even more hype for Old Spice?

  3. Mike P says:

    Hype is 1 thing, but a more interactive and engaging experience with the brand would be to follow up with free “product” or attach coupon codes or other incentives to get people to purchase the product. That is a more integrated campaign, IMO

    Mike Pascucci
    @mikepascucci

  4. Barry Silverstein says:

    I agree it’s a brilliant campaign. It has brought an old, tired brand back to life. It’s not often agency and client teams are able to be bold and use humor in a way that has this much impact. I wonder what if any copy testing research was used or if they just went for it?
    Very cool.

  5. Jack Cahill says:

    I agree with Barry. I remember the first time I saw this ad, I did a double take and thought to myself, “that was Old Spice?!”. Great job of making me start thinking “cool” about a brand I had pretty much forgotten about. And Lou, it cracks me up everytime too. Nice post.

Leave a Reply

Read more

FIFA Fever: Athletic brands take front stage

The World Cup has always been surrounded with ad campaigns from various brands trying to get a piece of the action, and this year is no exception. Some of the world’s top brands that have partnered with FIFA include Coca Cola, McDonald’s, VISA and SONY, to name just a few. In an event of such magnitude, athletic companies compete for center stage. Adidas is FIFA’s official partner but other companies have done their part to make themselves visible to the worldwide audience the World Cup draws. PUMA is one of these athletic brands that created an elaborate campaign to attract global audiences.

The World Cup has always been surrounded with ad campaigns from various brands trying to get a piece of the action, and this year is no exception. Some of the world’s top brands that have partnered with FIFA include Coca Cola, McDonald’s, VISA and SONY, to name just a few. In an event of such magnitude, athletic companies compete for center stage. Adidas is FIFA’s official partner but other companies have done their part to make themselves visible to the worldwide audience the World Cup draws. PUMA is one of these athletic brands that created an elaborate campaign to attract global audiences.

PUMA enlisted the collaboration of much sought-after artist Kehinde Wiley to create four original pieces of artwork featuring three of the best football players in Africa –Samuel Eto’o of Cameroon, John Mensah of Ghana, and Emmanuel Eboué of the Ivory Coast. The theme of this campaign was “African togetherness.” The company also created a unity uniform for African national teams.

PUMA has differentiated itself from the other athletic brands by relying on their long-established relationship with African football. Unlike the other brands, PUMA has had a presence in Africa for over a decade, sponsoring football teams in many African nations. Because the 2010 World Cup was held in Africa, creating this campaign was a clear fit for PUMA.

Additionally, the company introduced The PUMA Africa Collection, an apparel line inspired by the Kehinde Wiley portraits. And as part of their social responsibility efforts, PUMA is donating a portion of the Africa Unity Kit sales to programs in Africa that support diversity.

 With such efforts and immense amounts of cash that go into campaigns aimed at huge sporting events drawing even bigger audiences, as we are seeing in the World Cup, I can’t help but wonder how effective this particular sponsorship is in terms of revenue. It is clear that supporting a social cause, like the one PUMA is doing with diversity programs in Africa, is viewed positively by the consumer; but does this actually translate into dollars for the company? Will consumers buy the Kehinde Wiley-inspired items because of the “African togetherness” theme this campaign communicates or simply because the styles are appealing to the consumer? Or is it really just FIFA fever that is driving consumers out to their favorite sporting goods stores to buy World Cup apparel? 

I encourage everyone to chime in. From a marketing perspective, do you think these types of sponsorships really bring in big money for a brand or are other factors playing a role? Have you purchased World Cup apparel? Why? Do you support one brand over the other? Are social responsibility efforts important in your purchasing decisions? Or did you just like the style, regardless of the brand or the company’s support for socially responsible causes? 

If you’d like to see the portraits, merchandise, and making-of videos of PUMA’s campaign visit: http://africa.puma.com.

2 Responses to “FIFA Fever: Athletic brands take front stage”

  1. Janet Bednarz says:

    Lorena – This is a true confession of a born-in-America Baby Boomer: the World Cup is barely on my radar screen. My brother-in-law is from Spain, and every four years he rattles the chains of his provincial in-laws to get with the World Cup program! But we barely do. I keep an eye on the headlines to see how Spain is doing – but that’s about it. So…I have not purchased World Cup apparel.

    I do pay some attention, however, to the socially responsible actions of sports apparel brands. For example, I avoid Nike products because a number of years ago they were exposed for engaging in exploitive sweatshop practices in oversees manufacturing facilities. Their continued endorsement of Tiger Woods as a Nike spokesperson has alienated me even further.

    Patagonia, on the other hand, is an excellent example of being an environmentally and socially responsible business, so I try to buy their sports gear when I can.

    I like what PUMA is doing in Africa. Will it give them a good return on investment? Probably not with American-born Baby Boomers like me. But perhaps yes given the rich diversity of World Cup enthusiasts around the globe.

  2. Lorena Leonard says:

    Janet, thanks for your message… your point of view is quite interesting! I wasn’t aware of Nike’s involvement in sweatshops and I’m glad you brought that up. I don’t necessarily lend all of my support to a particular brand because of their social responsibility efforts but it does help. However, I am appalled by companies that are involved in immoral manufacturing practices and I try to boycott these -such as Guess, whom I’ve been boycotting since the 90’s for having children in sweatshops in Central America.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Can You See the Lite?

Friday features the most welcomed of workweek traditions, Happy Hour; a simple sip of suds revs up the relaxation regime as we brew a better vibe. So which beer-top will you pop?

Out with a new campaign, Miller Lite is making a bid for you to buy their brew. Their advertising recipe offers a bit of beer-battering, with a series of spots featuring a frisky bartender belittling men as boys for their willingness to accept any light beer — pulling punches with overplayed ‘computer bag/carryall-as-purse’ lines, ‘lose-the-skirt’ statements and the like. The givers of ‘Great Taste, Less Filling’ have gone aggressive, challenging would-be chuggers to ‘man-up’ and have a Miller Lite.

Friday features the most welcomed of workweek traditions, Happy Hour; a simple sip of suds revs up the relaxation regime as we brew a better vibe. So which beer-top will you pop?

Out with a new campaign, Miller Lite is making a bid for you to buy their brew. Their advertising recipe offers a bit of beer-battering, with a series of spots featuring a frisky bartender belittling men as boys for their willingness to accept any light beer — pulling punches with overplayed ‘computer bag/carryall-as-purse’ lines, ‘lose-the-skirt’ statements and the like. The givers of ‘Great Taste, Less Filling’ have gone aggressive, challenging would-be chuggers to ‘man-up’ and have a Miller Lite.

At the other end of the cooler, Heineken Light is looking for the same segment of sip seekers, but with a dramatically different design. Their commercials cover a pair of 30-something pals at a Florida retirement community, raking in lessons on life from their elders. An education earned through experience is shared in a series of chat sessions, serving up a glass of appreciation for the classically cool; those handing down the hops help inspire future brewmasters to ‘See The Light.’ Heineken Light is never mentioned outright, just coyly covered by a couple of clips of camera work.

The difference is degradation versus aspiration. Light (and/or Lite) beers serve their purpose, simpler on the stomach and efficient space savers; but few beer buyers (particularly the guys both brewers are going after) define themselves, or more to the point, their manhood, by way of light beer. The context Miller Lite has created, testing testosterone levels by goading guys, falls flat; while Heineken helps itself by giving men the means to elevate their game — the difference is focusing on what we hope to be, rather than what we are not. It’s bottoms up. 

As always, a beat to help you break for the weekend in search of your own brouhaha; be sure to raise a mug in honor of the men you define as Dad!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Last Chance Market Researcher

Anyone who knows me knows that I’m not exactly fashion-conscious. In fact, I’m just grateful when I get to work and discover that I’m wearing matching shoes.

So it was somewhat ironic that while sitting in the Heathrow departure lounge last week awaiting a flight home from London, I was approached by a uniformed woman. She had excellent posture and carried a clipboard.

Anyone who knows me knows that I’m not exactly fashion-conscious. In fact, I’m just grateful when I get to work and discover that I’m wearing matching shoes.

So it was somewhat ironic that while sitting in the Heathrow departure lounge last week awaiting a flight home from London, I was approached by a uniformed woman. She had excellent posture and carried a clipboard.

“May I have a few minutes of your time?” she asked, and then sat down next to me without awaiting an answer.

What have I done? I worriedly wondered.  Had I packed 5 oz. of shampoo? Was my passport expired? Did they know I’d inhaled in 1972?

“I’d like to ask you about your impressions of Heathrow Airport,” she said briskly, but with a tinge of desperation.

The light dawned. She was a market researcher! This was an airport lounge intercept!

My heart went out to her.  “Ask away,” I said graciously.

She did, page after bloody page.

They’d unloaded the arriving flight by the time we finished with what was important to me in an airport. (“Fresh fruit” and “clean bathrooms with hundreds of stalls” weren’t answer options. If they had been, both would have scored a 5 – Very Important.)

By the time the plane was cleaned and I’d triumphantly recalled the name of that movie with Emma Thompson and Dustin Hoffman (Last Chance Harvey, where she plays a beleaguered market researcher who works at  – wait for it – Heathrow!), we’d advanced through how I felt about my actual experience since arriving at the airport 90 minutes earlier. (It hadn’t been bad, actually, except for this entrapment. But that wasn’t an answer option either.)

I thought we were in the home stretch when she suddenly whipped out a laminated folding card containing lots of pictures of sunglasses advertisements.

“Do you recall seeing these adverts?” she asked, waving them in front of my face so quickly that I felt a welcome breeze.

In my mind’s eye, I started flipping through every poster I’d seen in the past five days. “Um, yeah, I think so.”

“Where did you see them?”

I thought back to riding the endless escalators in the London Underground. Were there ads for anything other than The Lion King? “In the Tube?” I answered hopefully.

“Was it a poster or an electronic sign?”

Think, Julie, think. Did they have electronic signs in the Tube? “Poster,” I answered, far more definitively than I actually felt. I was hoping my bravado would hide the fact that I had no frigging clue.

“Do you think this advertising is appropriate for Heathrow?” she asked, this time not even going through the motions of showing me the ads again.

Appropriate for Heathrow, I mused. What advertising would be inappropriate for Heathrow? Well, explosives, of course. Or anything with ex-Duchess Fergie.  “Yes, I do.”

“Would it make you more likely to purchase sunglasses at Heathrow?” she demanded.

Only if there were sunlamps on the airplane, I thought gracelessly. “Hmm … I don’t know. Is that an answer option?”

By now, the volcanic ash cloud had moved from the skies over the North Atlantic to the skies over the South Pacific; Krakatoa had erupted, and sea levels in Europe and North America had risen by two feet, errr, meters. But amazingly, we were finally done.

It was only as I watched her still starchy but somehow defeated figure leave the lounge that I noticed, yes, a large, flashy electronic billboard advertising stylish sunglasses for sale at Heathrow. I’d been sitting opposite it for at least a half-hour before she came.

Exhausted, I slumped into my husband’s shoulder and pointed mutely at the billboard.

My husband’s a journalist, and when he’s training rookies, he always tells them, “Don’t ask people questions they don’t know how to answer.” He chuckled, not at all surprised by my obliviousness to the ad. “Clearly, she didn’t know who she was talking to.”

And that, dear reader, is the point of this little anecdote.

I might have been a random sample, eligible for this research largely because I was breathing and sentient, but the only time I buy anything other than earrings, food and books is when my feet are barefoot, my skin is scorched or I’m out of coffee.

I didn’t know how to answer the researcher’s questions about the efficacy of that sunglasses billboard.  Her time and mine were completely wasted and her data completely lacking in validity because she didn’t know who she was talking to. Had she simply conversed with me, she might have learned that I actually buy sunglasses routinely because I lose them routinely, that if had they been for sale at a kiosk just outside the airport instead of wedged between two high-end stores I never go near, I would have bought them in a heartbeat. She might have learned that I value durability above appearance. And maybe, just maybe, I would remember her as a curious and empathetic person, not as an intrusive and indifferent one. 

No offense, Emma.

Leave a Reply

Read more

From “Sellout” to “Sold Out,” or How I Learned to Hate Success

“Ah man, I saw that band years ago at a small club. I’m not paying $150 to see them at [insert name of big sports/music venue]! They’re a bunch of sellouts”

It’s a pretty typical story: small (often independent) band cultivates loyal following only to lose their most passionate fans when the band earns real notoriety and money. I’m one of these “bad weather fans,” as we’re often called. I’m fine with it; I’ve got an entire CD and cassette tape graveyard of bands I used to love, but who outgrew my affinity and loyalty.

“Ah man, I saw that band years ago at a small club.  I’m not paying $150 to see them at [insert name of big sports/music venue]!  They’re a bunch of sellouts” 

It’s a pretty typical story:  small (often independent) band cultivates loyal following only to lose their most passionate fans when the band earns real notoriety and money.  I’m one of these “bad weather fans,” as we’re often called.  I’m fine with it; I’ve got an entire CD and cassette tape graveyard of bands I used to love, but who outgrew my affinity and loyalty.

The truth is this:  I like to have secrets.  Whether it’s legitimate or not, I like to feel like I have insider knowledge, like I’m an early adopter.  I don’t like it when my favorite things “become mass.”  Which is why I was so angry when I recently logged on to my go-to shopping site, Diapers.com, and was informed that the site was out of commission due to…gulp…too much activity.

I stared at the screen in disbelief.  I kept clicking “refresh” in the hope that this mirage of popularity would disappear.  It remained.  Then it hit me, “This is my fault.  It’s entirely my fault.”

I’ve been telling any parent who would listen to use Diapers.com—great prices and free, super-fast shipping.  I can’t live without it.  (Shoot!  I just did it again. )  That’s the problem with word-of-mouth campaigns.   Once you endorse the thing you love, you run the risk of losing it. 

The irony of the whole thing is that early adopters often want their beloved musician or product to succeed, but they don’t want them to change.  There’s an emotional payoff in the “I knew them when” story. But it can quickly turn to disdain when fans/customers don’t feel like the memory is reciprocated.

It’s a real challenge for marketers.  How do you expand your market and keep your core customers satisfied?  I know it’s a particularly vexing question in the world of public television, and it’s certainly a pain point being felt by Facebook

I won’t pretend to give the answer here, but I’ll share this tidbit:  Elvis Costello often asks his crowd how many attendees were at smaller venues/shows in the past.  It’s a nice acknowledgement and a creative way to single out the loyalists.  As for Diapers.com, PBS and others dealing with these issues, they’d be well-suited to find their industry’s equivalent of the “backstage pass.”  What better way to find out then to ask those who have been loyal since the beginning.  As for me, I’ll take a free box of Sprout baby food from Diapers.com. 

Oh, have I told you about Sprout?!

One Response to “From “Sellout” to “Sold Out,” or How I Learned to Hate Success”

  1. Carrie says:

    I think it’s also your fault that Bare Naked Ladies got so big. You should have just kept them to yourself before all of that Kraft Macaroni and Cheese starting flying their way on stage

Leave a Reply

Read more

Minivan Dreams Powered by Toyota

I want a minivan and I don’t want to be judged! When I was in my early twenties, I drove a minivan and it was the car-of-choice among me and my friends. We didn’t care what we were driving in, as long as we were together and the music was loud. I could fit 10 people in that minivan; it was a punk rock clown car.

I now fit the profile of a minivan driver—I’m in my thirties and I’ve reproduced—and therefore I’ve been told by friends and family that I absolutely cannot drive a minivan.

It’s not fair!

I want a minivan and I don’t want to be judged! When I was in my early twenties, I drove a minivan and it was the car-of-choice among me and my friends. We didn’t care what we were driving in, as long as we were together and the music was loud. I could fit 10 people in that minivan; it was a punk rock clown car.

I now fit the profile of a minivan driver—I’m in my thirties and I’ve reproduced—and therefore I’ve been told by friends and family that I absolutely cannot drive a minivan.

It’s not fair!

I have musician friends who drive minivans. So, it’s okay to open that deliciously-easy sliding door if you’re taking a bass guitar out of it, but it’s lame if my son is the precious cargo?

Enter Toyota’s new “Meet the Parents” ads for the Sienna Minivan.

      

These ads are pure genius, playing on an oft-forgotten truism of cool: There’s nothing less cool than trying to be cool.

Will the ads convince naysayers to enter through the sliding door? I live with one data point who might be coming around. As for me, I consider myself an early adopter. (How cool is that?)

5 Responses to “Minivan Dreams Powered by Toyota”

  1. Noah Shaw (aka, Data Point Numero Uno) says:

    This data point — the one who lives with the author of this post — is sooooooo not coming around. Sorry honey.

  2. Kate DeVagno says:

    The only thing cooler than a 2010 Toyota Sienna? The 1998 Toyota Sienna I’ve been driving for two years, prior to the birth of my daughter. The best part? After parents gave it to me, they missed it so much they ended up buying a new Sienna. How many retired boomers buy a minivan after their kids are out of the house? Now that’s love!

  3. K-Monayyyy says:

    I purchased a swagger wagon. Now if I could only find the friends to populate the seats I’d be able to cruise around town in sweet victory!

  4. Jill (aka A Sienna Driver) says:

    As a relatively new mini-van driver, I have 3 words for you that won my husband over – Automatic. Sliding. Doors. I can’t express how valuable it is to be doing the daycare pickup in the rain or snow and be able to open the doors from across the parking lot and have my son climb in and get into his car seat by himself. It’s little conveniences like this that meant the minivan was the only car we test-drove.

  5. Mama Mariko says:

    I heart my swagger wagon. When I saw the ads on television for the first time I laughed out loud. When I saw them the second time, I turned to my husband, who is not in marketing and I’m not sure really understands what I do for a living and said, “that’s what I do!”. I hunt for insights as brilliant as this one. The campaign is obviously founded on a brilliant insight!

    The Toyota Sienna is the best. As a driver of a fully loaded, black, 2010 Sienna, I am one happy mama. My parents came for a visit last weekend and we happily traveled all over – together! We would have otherwise had to rent a second car and follow eachother around. Not to mention, we can jump in back and tend to a crying baby (or two in our family) – and not skip a beat. I couldn’t heart my Sienna more.

    My slogan when we first decided to break down and go minivan shopping was, “there are other ways to feel sexy”. Now with the ad campaign, I can drive around in my swagger wagon AND feel sexy. So there.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Tiny Dancer

Secure your sequins and squeeze into those spandex, ice skating is in season. Through 14 days of Olympic Coverage there’s been naught but a single night where audiences weren’t subjected to ice skating in some form—the Opening Ceremony. Apparently by “coverage” of the Olympic Games, NBC meant a spotlight on skating in all its forms.

Despite a limited love for the sport, admittedly accredited to an inability to see past the pageantry nor distinguish between a salchow and axel jump , through this past weekend I had set a personal record in viewership—that is until Ice Dancing dominated Monday’s lineup and I was finally forced to put the games on ice.

Secure your sequins and squeeze into those spandex, ice skating is in season. Through 14 days of Olympic Coverage there’s been naught but a single night where audiences weren’t subjected to ice skating in some form—the Opening Ceremony. Apparently by “coverage” of the Olympic Games, NBC meant a spotlight on skating in all its forms.

Despite a limited love for the sport, admittedly accredited to an inability to see past the pageantry nor distinguish between a salchow and axel jump , through this past weekend I had set a personal record in viewership—that is until Ice Dancing dominated Monday’s lineup and I was finally forced to put the games on ice. 

My personal preference aside, the chorus of complaints from viewers has continued (and climbed) through the weeks. The USA-plus  plan for coverage, using downtime in skating to show snippets of other events (often on delay from earlier in the day) leaves something to be desired—like seeing other countries compete in any of the events. Those on the West Coast  are riddled with ridiculous three-hour lag times, despite having clocks tuned to the same time-zone as Vancouver and real-time access to results. Ignoring mass-interest in another episode on ice, US versus Canada in hockey, NBC excommunicated the event to cable’s MSNBC, a news network; 8.22 million fans followed (again, a near record in ratings), but we’re left to guess what the game would have drawn if offered en masse on basic cable.

Not long ago much was made of NBC’s creative use of ratings to endorse Leno’s return to the late night lineup, a policy they’re playfully pulling back out of their PR pocket . While its true viewership has vaulted past Turin—my attention isn’t for entertainment, it’s for endurance.

NBC is surviving on the success of America’s record run of medals and increased interest in more extreme events, while falsely assigning credit to their own “premier programming.” If the path to seeing Shaun White grab gold leads through tassels and toe loop jumps, then so be it—but my attention and affinity for the network is on thin ice.

Here’s to uncovering a universally understood maxim heavy hitters, the pleasure of a few work-free days!

Leave a Reply

Read more