Archive for the ‘Business Strategy’ Category

The Risk of Not Making Mistakes

Risk is a tricky concept. Business typically wants to limit, manage, or mitigate it. Eliminating risk altogether probably would be seen as the ultimate success (thank you, Six Sigma). But in life, most great things don’t come without some level of risk.

Getting married, having kids, quitting a job, taking a new one. Think of any of the biggest developments in your life or the broader world around you and I’d bet none of those happen without a fair amount of risk.

Risk is a tricky concept. Business typically wants to limit, manage, or mitigate it. Eliminating risk altogether probably would be seen as the ultimate success (thank you, Six Sigma). But in life, most great things don’t come without some level of risk.

Getting married, having kids, quitting a job, taking a new one. Think of any of the biggest developments in your life or the broader world around you and I’d bet none of those happen without a fair amount of risk.

However, from an early age we are taught to avoid risk. We understand that with risk comes mistakes. And mistakes can be painful. But making mistakes is also how we learn.

We aren’t born knowing that the square peg doesn’t fit into the round hole. We need to try it for ourselves. We experiment. We learn not only what doesn’t fit, we also learn what does. And in that process of learning we begin to see relationships—those between shapes and spaces, challenges and solutions, effort and satisfaction. More is learned from the time spent trying than if we got it all right on the first attempt.

But in business, mistakes mean more cost, more time, and lost opportunities. With the drive towards higher levels of productivity, higher margins, and more efficiency we don’t have room for mistakes.

Without that room, the ability of business to learn and grow is limited. Sure, companies can capitalize on incremental opportunities but they will miss the bigger breakthroughs because they didn’t see as many relationships, have as many experiences, or try as hard. They won’t learn as much from their mistakes, because they won’t make as many of them.

Companies need to create room for mistakes. To explore and try out stuff with their customers. To learn. And to do so faster, to get to the right solution sooner. When companies can make mistakes (ideally outside of the public eye) they can learn invaluable lessons from doing so and bring their customers better solutions because of it.

Risk isn’t that tricky of a concept if you think about it differently—not as the negative value of an event, but as a process capable of yielding positive, even breakthrough results. Make a practice of making mistakes. Create a private space in which to do so. Build a “learning agenda” for your company. And embrace risk. Because what’s true in life is true in business—most great things don’t happen without a fair amount of risk.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Wavering Brand Loyalty: The Toyota Recall

When did Toyota stop taking its customers seriously? When did it stop listening to them? Why would a self-described Toyota loyalist even ask these questions? Bear with me for a few moments and I’ll explain why.

When did Toyota stop taking its customers seriously? When did it stop listening to them? Why would a self-described Toyota loyalist even ask these questions? Bear with me for a few moments and I’ll explain why.

My journey as a Toyota loyalist began at a young age. As a child I always knew my family could depend on our Corolla station wagon or hatchback to safely get us where we needed to go without any worries or drama. It’s hard to recall even one time when these cars let us down. (Well, maybe the time when one of my parents left the headlights on and drained the battery, but I don’t think that counts.) Even as a kid I remember admiring a company that seemed genuinely focused on making products of the highest quality—even its marketing seemed to take the high road and eschew negative mentions of other car brands.

Not surprisingly, when my significant other needed to replace his troublesome Pontiac, I strongly encouraged him to consider a Toyota. He saw the light, and for the past six years we’ve been driving a completely reliable Matrix which hasn’t let us down once. It seemed a given that our next car would be a Toyota (we’ve been coveting the Prius), but the recent recalls and Toyota’s handling of the situation have me questioning this choice and wondering what happened to the company I’ve admired for so long.

I guess part of me believes Toyota is a casualty of its own success. Like so many companies that grow large very quickly (perhaps too quickly?), it seems to have lost touch with reality and with its customers. Perhaps it even saw itself as immune to these types of problems. You can almost imagine company executives’ naïve disbelief at hearing news of the problems—this could NEVER happen at Toyota! It’s troubling to hear how customers’ concerns were initially ignored and how Toyota initially blamed the sudden acceleration problem on drivers. This type of behavior makes you wonder if besting the Big Three became more important than the brand’s pillars of quality, value, and reliability. I’d bet you that most Toyota owners could care less about the company’s ascendancy and simply want to know that their concerns matter—especially when it comes to safety.

Despite the recent recalls, I still have faith in the company—especially since I continue to experience the quality of its products on a nearly daily basis. I haven’t given up hope that Toyota will do some serious corporate soul-searching, review its priorities, and once again see the customer as its main stakeholder. After all, I still have my heart set on getting a gas-sipping Prius.

What are your experiences with the Toyota brand? How do you think Toyota has handled its recent quality problems? What, if anything, can it do to recover? A loyalist wants to know.

2 Responses to “Wavering Brand Loyalty: The Toyota Recall”

  1. Diane Mimmo says:

    Great article! I am not a lifelong Toyota enthusiast, but the Venza and the Highlander are on my list of candidates for our next crossover/ SUV and these incidents have tipped me back in favor of the Honda products. Even with all the bad press, I don’t think they are in danger of losing customers to the Big Three- in my opinion they are still above and beyond in terms of quality…but maybe in danger of losing customers to other Japanese automakers.

  2. I agree the sentiments you penned in this article. As a long term Toyota loyalist, all my 3 cars I owned/own are Toyota, I am very disappointed. The way Toyota is dealing with the situation is not right. I had to bite my tongue and make a official complaint to NTSB about my 2010 prius. I feel Toyota should have taken ownership of the problem and done something better to preserve confidence in the brand. They missed the boat of telling their customers that they do care and go to any lengths to provide them a better experience. The previous Rav4 I owned for 10 years and it never failed on me. And I hope Toyota will do the same.. I can see lots of class action suits brewing in the background.

Leave a Reply

Read more

And the Best (Big) Picture Award Goes to…Pepsi

I live for awards season. I love the Golden Globes, honestly believe the SAG Awards really do mean more, and [deep sigh] swoon over the Oscars. It is in the spirit of film awards, that I offer you some 2010 Super Brand Awards:

I live for awards season. I love the Golden Globes, honestly believe the SAG Awards really do mean more, and [deep sigh] swoon over the Oscars. It is in the spirit of film awards, that I offer you some 2010 Super Brand Awards:

Best Actor: Domino’s Pizza
I know that the idea to address consumer complaints in ads has been polarizing, but I’ve loved every minute. You’re advertising that you’ve changed; you’re listening to your consumers; you’re advertising that you’re listening. You’re so Meta—the Daniel Day-Lewis of pizza.

Best Supporting Actress: Diapers.com
You’re the new exemplar of online shopping. The selection! The free shipping! You’re the picture of flexibility, versatility, and consistency. You remind me of a young Amazon.com.

Best Director: The International Red Cross
Your “text ‘Haiti’ to 90999” campaign provided individuals an easy and affordable way to help victims of the earthquake. You harnessed the power of social media and of mobile devices to create change. Your work will be copied, but I doubt it could ever be out done.  Mmmmm… the “Avatar” of philanthropy. 

Best (Big) Picture: Pepsi
Kudos, Pepsi! When other, less innovative, brands are spending an exorbitant amount to advertise during the Super Bowl, you’ve made a bold move and decided to end your 23-year run as a big game advertiser. Instead you are using $20 million marketing dollars to listen to and better the lives of your customers. You’re the advertising equivalent of De Niro in ‘Raging Bull.’ Bravo!

One Response to “And the Best (Big) Picture Award Goes to…Pepsi”

  1. Despite distancing myself from the Oscars after the shameful decision to increase the number of nominated films for Best Picture from 5 to 10 (really, double?), I’d like to cast a vote for:

    Best Original Screenplay: Will It Blend by Blendtec – captured my heart with their crushing campaign of introducing a new ingredient (iPods, baseballs, video cameras and more) to their blender blog daily. http://www.blendtec.com/willitblend/

    Best Adapted Screenplay: Intel – the good folks of Intel have effectively given a personality to their inanimate product with their latest campaign. The ‘Our Rockstars Aren’t Like Your Rockstars’ series proved equally poignant in several mediums from TV to print, no simple task. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqLPHrCQr2I

Leave a Reply

Read more

How to Sell Listening to Your Organization

First, let me thank Communispace for inviting me to be a guest blogger. I think I’ll ask Diane to return the favor on my blog in the near future.

Now the topic…

People who are involved with listening approaches (mining conversations in blogs, managed communities, etc.) get a little frustrated sometimes; they ask me for guidance of how to sell listening.

First, let me thank Communispace for inviting me to be a guest blogger.  I think I’ll ask Diane to return the favor on my blog in the near future.

Now the topic…

People who are involved with listening approaches (mining conversations in blogs, managed communities, etc.) get a little frustrated sometimes; they ask me for guidance of how to sell listening.

Here is my advice; don’t think of this as research.  Think of it as process reinvention.

For example, consider how an organization might reinvent its innovation process.  How could any informed marketer, when rethinking innovation in an era of social media, NOT integrate listening into the innovation process?  Listening is about hearing what people rather than the marketer wants to talk about, and hearing it in people’s own words.  It’s a window in the mind, heart and emotions of people, one you need to have your nose pressed up against continuously.  Because things change…really fast…giving agile marketers great opportunities leaving traditional marketers wearing the WTF happened look on their faces.

Traditionally, research has been at the fuzzy front end with qual and downstream with volumetric concept or concept/product testing.  Listening is about realizing that things change constantly.  Consumer needs are not linear and scheduled, they change at any time.  If there is no linear process, there is no fuzzy front-END; this is continuous and listening is essential.  Your concept testing must morph into learning experiments instead of magic number idea killers.  If you missed the action standard, learn why.  Is the underlying premise wrong or the idea impractical from a business point of view?  If not, keep working at; if yes, move on.

Now it gets even crazier.  Innovation is not just about creating new “things” with new features.  Brands are experiences and the innovation might come from a connection made via social media.  For Unilever’s Dove Campaign for Real Beauty, the innovation is in the media—creating social media environments, videos, and events that were intended to change people’s concept of beauty in a way that would enhance female self-esteem.  It was a great and innovative thing to do and not a new SKU in sight!

Now if the fuzzy front end is really a continuous backdrop requiring listening, it also means that there is little difference between new product innovation and existing brand sense and respond.  It’s all about a marketer intersecting their assets with emerging needs to serve people—add value to daily human life—who cares if you do that via media, new products, or rethinking your existing brand?  It’s about the need, not your brand management structure.

In an era when 300 million or more are on Facebook, where word of mouth is becoming one of the most trusted sources of advice, and where people love sharing their feelings online in communities, how can a marketer not want to tap into this constant and organic flow of conversations?

IMHO, that’s how you sell listening.

To learn more about how to become an agent of change for your organization regarding listening, come to the ARF’s workshop on Jan 28th in San Francisco, “Putting Listening to Work”.  All attendees will also receive a copy of our just published book, “The ARF Listening Playbook” which contains 35 great success stories that wouldn’t have happened without listening.

Leave a Reply

Read more

An Open Letter to Restaurateurs:

Over the holidays I spent a lot of time in restaurants. I went to everything from fast-casual to white-table-cloth establishments, and I found that all of them were all but ignoring one important group of customers – children.

I know what you are thinking: Why aren’t you going to those “kid friendly places” that have the clowns and balloons and video games? Isn’t that where parents go? My answer: Have you been to one of these little corners of Hell? Ok, maybe that’s a little harsh, but I am an adult and I want to have a clown-free evening! Can’t I do that and still have my child enjoy the experience?

Over the holidays I spent a lot of time in restaurants. I went to everything from fast-casual to white-table-cloth establishments, and I found that all of them were all but ignoring one important group of customers – children.

I know what you are thinking: Why aren’t you going to those “kid friendly places” that have the clowns and balloons and video games? Isn’t that where parents go? My answer: Have you been to one of these little corners of Hell? Ok, maybe that’s a little harsh, but I am an adult and I want to have a clown-free evening! Can’t I do that and still have my child enjoy the experience?

An article in The New York Times touches on this quandary as it tells the tale of a group of Brooklyn moms who were banned from going to a local bar with their kids. Though I am talking about restaurants rather than bars, one of these moms made me think when she said, “[Going to this bar is] one way of denying that your youthful exploits come with a shelf-life… Psychologically, you feel like, ‘Oh, my life hasn’t changed that much.’”  So I’ll admit it, maybe I am still going to all the same restaurants that I went to before my three year old was born because I don’t want to admit that things have changed that much. But should they have to? Can’t restaurants do a little better job servicing our kids (and their parents)?

So, restaurant owners out there, I have some suggestions and observations that I would like to share:

Rethink your kids’ menu. If you had kids or were thinking about them, you would know that everything needs to have a fancy made-up name (think “super princess burger” not “hamburger”). And don’t be afraid to veer from the old standbys. The happiest my daughter ever was at a restaurant was the time she was able to order a “chocolate sandwich” from the menu. It was simply Nutella on toasted honey wheat bread, but she stared at it in awe and quietly ate the entire plate-sized sandwich without a single peep for 20 minutes. If this restaurant was local I would go there once a week.

Crayons are nice, but can you mix it up a bit? We went to a restaurant last year that brought over “Wikki Stix” when we were seated (for those of you unfamiliar – click here). They even let my daughter pick her favorite colors and brought extras when she had used all of her initial set. She was entertained for the entire meal and I was blown away. And how simple was that little idea? We now go to that restaurant at least monthly.

Kids are customers too. I can’t tell you how many times I have been in a restaurant where the waiter completely ignores my child. I am not expecting them to tell me how cute they think she is (even though she really is cute), but it would be nice if you said hello to her when you were greeting us. And can you work with me on when you are delivering my child’s food? I know best when it should come, and believe me it changes with every meal, so involve me — and for the love of god don’t bring me scalding hot food! Let me tell you my friend, that is one quick way to lose your tip and our business. For good.

So, long story short, Mr. and Mrs. Restaurant Purveyor; I want you to think about kids and their parents. We are an important and underserved target. And if we are going to spend our hard-earned, disposable income in this economy, we are going to choose the restaurants that are doing it right and leave the plain hamburgers, crayons and scalding hot fries behind.

6 Responses to “An Open Letter to Restaurateurs:”

  1. Karen Barone says:

    Jen,
    I totally agree with you and those insightful women from Brooklyn. We have found a GREAT adult/KID-friendly restaurant: GASLIGHT in the South End.
    I know. I know. It seems impossible, but it’s true. The food is incredible, there’s parking (!!!!!!!!!) and they’re totally cool with kids. They don’t offer toys/crayons/whatnot, but they don’t mind if the table gets crowded with the ones you bring from home. Not perfect, but it’s a start. (Did I mention the parking?)

  2. Jen,
    you rule! As the father of three children, 1 small, 2 not so much anymore, I hear you sister.
    I will share your blog with our 6 restaurants and who knows, Wikki Stix may be coming to a small French/Mediterranean Bistro/Brasserie or American Bistro near you soon!
    Thanks for continuing to dine out in this troubled economy.
    By the way, in my 30 years of business, I have never fielded a complaint regarding and unruly child patron. Wish I could say the same for all of my adult patrons.
    Please feel free contacting me directly with any comments or requests.
    Jeffrey Gates
    Partner
    Gaslight Brasserie du Coin
    Aquitaine Group
    jgates@aquitainegroup.com

  3. Jen Maltby says:

    Thanks Jeffrey, and you make an excellent point about this troubled economy. It’s really never been more important to pay attention to all your patrons. Keep up the great work and see you at Gaslight soon!

  4. Jani Fraga says:

    Jen,
    I love this entry, and as an ex-waitress, I can completely relate. Although the restaurant I worked at appeared to have an age limit, we had an arsenal of children’s books, crayons, and etch-a-sketches on stand-by for our high-chaired guests. The kids’ menu had a contest every year for the little artists to submit their best drawings of the kid cuisine, and some were featured in the menu. do-it-yourself ice cream sundaes and a good-bye balloon always seemed to leave a sweet impression.

    I always felt that in order for the parents (and myself) to have a stress-free experience, the kids were always key. “appetizer-soup-salad” timelines were modified to “appeI WANT MY HOT DOGtizer-soup-salad” … or any other customized randition :)

    Although I have no kids of my own (yet) I would love to hear more about kid-tested, mother-approved spots to go with my friends and their little ones!

  5. Erin (Giroux) Antonellis says:

    As a veteran of the restaurant industry I have seen the best and worst case scenarios of children dining out. For the most part I didn’t agree with parents bringing their children, strollers, diaper bags, toys, CHEERIOS (you will find Cheerios for weeks after) etc. out on weekend night at a busy restaurant. It didn’t seem like the right place or right time for children. This could have been because it was mid-July on Martha’s Vineyard or the fact that I was a selfish twenty-two year old (I am guessing it was me!).

    As I think back I completely disregarded the fact that with every child is a couple of parents who are people too. They want to enjoy a night out, a vacation and God forbid each other! It wasn’t until my friends started having kids that I became the biggest supporter of our favorite couples keeping things status quo and not wanting their “youthful exploits to come with a shelf-life”. I still want to hang out with my best girlfriends and our favorite wine-loving couples with or without kids.

    So why can’t we have our cake and eat it too? Mr. Gates makes a very good point – no one is really going to complain about a child patron. For the most part parents that take their children out to a nicer “non-kid-friendly / corner of hell” restaurant come prepared (toys, extra bottles, books etc.). So in these tough times why not open your doors to these parents and welcome them with Wikki Stix and Princess Burgers because after all…their money is green too!

  6. Jen Maltby says:

    Erin,
    So well said; and you bring up a really interesting point that I didn’t consider. Often times when my husband and I go out with our child it is with other couples. So you aren’t just losing our $ when you under-serve us, you’re losing theirs. Something to think about.
    Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Are Your Customers Responding or Sharing?

I’m a member of a consumer research panel. I get emails about once a month asking me to respond to a survey or two from a well respected management consulting firm. The surveys are about 25–30 questions in length and take about fifteen minutes to complete.

I respond to their questions but must admit: I kinda tune out after about question twelve, especially when it sounds an awful lot like question seven. And then I begin wondering why they’re asking this in the first place; what am I gonna have for lunch; and what really is the difference between “somewhat agree” and “somewhat disagree”?

I’m a member of a consumer research panel. I get emails about once a month asking me to respond to a survey or two from a well respected management consulting firm. The surveys are about 25–30 questions in length and take about fifteen minutes to complete.

I respond to their questions but must admit: I kinda tune out after about question twelve, especially when it sounds an awful lot like question seven. And then I begin wondering why they’re asking this in the first place; what am I gonna have for lunch; and what really is the difference between “somewhat agree” and “somewhat disagree”?

On this panel I’m a respondent. I’m not me. I don’t open-up. I’ll click the box; drag-and-drop my response; or rate the following on a scale of 1–5 all day long. However, at the end of the survey, the esteemed consulting firm won’t know me any better than they did before I took their survey. They will know my responses. And while I’m trying my best to tell the truth with each response, I feel like I’m doing a terrible job at it. I feel like a subject in a study, not like myself.

My experience as a respondent (and seemingly like the experiences of others) begs a pretty important question for this consulting firm. Are your findings from your research actually right? While they may be “statistically significant,” “nationally representative,” or “projectable” they may not be “true.” And that’s a problem… a pretty big one.

So maybe the question is not, “how ‘statistically significant’ is the data?” but “how ‘personally significant’ is it?” Are people opening up and sharing their intimate thoughts and emotions or are they simply responding to what you’re asking?

I feel like I could be a lot more helpful to the consulting firm (and their clients) if we had a conversation. If I knew someone was listening and not just crunching my data. If I could share ideas with other like-minded people and build on theirs. If the conversation were facilitated by someone who cared what I had to say rather than presented as a forced set of questions.

Instead, the panel company, the consulting firm and their clients keep me at a distance—only asking what they want to know, how they want to know it. They have my data points to point to but they don’t have me. They aren’t engaging me. And as a result, they don’t know me. 

So ask yourself, do you really know your customers, or do you know their data points? Are you treating them like respondents or like people you want to get to know?

One Response to “Are Your Customers Responding or Sharing?”

  1. Praz says:

    Interesting post, I think the Online Panel Industry is going through a revolution of sorts (who isn’t?) with Social Media becoming more and more mainstream. I’ve long argued that simply “asking” people questions in a more siloed manner rarely gets accurate or “rich” results.

    The sentence below perfectly captures the sentiment here.

    “On this panel I’m a respondent. I’m not me. I don’t open-up. I’ll click the box; drag-and-drop my response; or rate the following on a scale of 1–5 all day long. However, at the end of the survey, the esteemed consulting firm won’t know me any better than they did before I took their survey”

    When the dialogue and conversations is 1 way people KNOW they are a mere figure or stat, that their “responses will be grouped with those of other people so they won’t be recognized” which in turns somewhat defeats the purpose of Social Media and Communities as this field is a) about recognition and the having your voice heard by joining the conversation and 2) they’re in it just for the incentives.

    Also love this point here: “So maybe the question is not, “how ‘statistically significant’ is the data?” but “how ‘personally significant’ is it?”

    In our obsession with “methodology”, we’ve started to over-look the basic art of listening to what people are talking about already. Are you more likely to get richer insights from a 1-way Online Survey with Respondents? Or from a Community of people who use the product, and are either advocates (or “haters”) of it? I’d personally say the latter!

    I’ll be sharing this on my blog too….thanks for a interesting read,

    Regards,

    Praz

Leave a Reply

Read more

Branding in the Age of Relational Media

In 1989, George Fields (the founder of ASI Market Research) gave me a copy of his book, Gucci on the Ginza—a fascinating exploration of Japanese consumer culture. In his book, Fields employs the term Shinjinrui—meaning, in a most literal sense, a new type of person. This idea remains valid in this age of relational media—Shinjinrui march to their own tune and don’t always run with the crowd as we have seen with Facebook, YouTube, and of course Twitter. Shinjinrui also engage with brands on their own unique terms and expect the same in return.

In 1989, George Fields (the founder of ASI Market Research) gave me a copy of his book, Gucci on the Ginza—a fascinating exploration of Japanese consumer culture. In his book, Fields employs the term Shinjinrui—meaning, in a most literal sense, a new type of person. This idea remains valid in this age of relational media—Shinjinrui march to their own tune and don’t always run with the crowd as we have seen with Facebook, YouTube, and of course Twitter. Shinjinrui also engage with brands on their own unique terms and expect the same in return.

Here’s why… crowds by their very nature are amorphous masses whose only identity is the mass itself. Crowds, like sleeping giants, can be easily awakened. At the slightest of provocations, crowds turn very ugly and morph into mobs (as was recently witnessed at the Web 2.0 Expo). Similarly, when I worked for a social/relational media monitoring company, we found that there were a lot of ‘brand haters’ out there—racists, extremists, shills, and scam artists, all of whom had no interest other than compromising the reputations of many of the institutions and organizations that make our society a civil place. This brings us to the importance of community and how it can contribute to brand building.

Brands by their very nature are unique and distinctive unto themselves: UPS’s logo and uniform models of brown trucks, Big Blue—the IBM logo, and the Nike ‘swoosh’—a brand that doesn’t even need a name to be recognized universally. Some are even represented by characters that are symbolic of what their brands stand for: Ronald McDonald, Frosted Flakes’ Tony the Tiger, Mr. Clean, and the grand old man of 111 years, Bibendum, a.k.a. The Michelin Man. Bib, incidentally, is currently on a campaign to reduce gasoline consumption worldwide.

So this raises a key question: how does a crowd relate to a brand in the first place? I don’t think it can, because it’s the individual customer who has the brand experience at the 1:1 level. It is the customer who relates in their own unique way to the things that brands stand for, such as Dove’s ‘Campaign for Real Beauty’. If these brands do reach out and touch consumers at the individual level, why would they seek out the opinions of the undifferentiated masses? Brand communities are composed of homogeneous groups (segments) that have a set of shared interests and lifestyles that engage with the likes of Dove beauty products. As Diane Hessan mentioned early in the year, “…if the crowd is smaller, more intimacy leads to higher engagement.”

It would be ironic, perhaps poetic, if some prolific texting Millennial brand manager, likely a Shinjinrui, stood up in an agency briefing and declared: “We need to identify a specific consumer segment and do some target marketing.”

Leave a Reply

Read more

Dishing with Diane: Jerry Kane shares his perspective on the power of social media

Jerry Kane, Assistant Professor of Information Systems, Carroll School of Management Boston College, sat down with me recently to discuss how companies can gauge the effectiveness of social media within their organizations. He provides his professional perspective on the future of social networking.

Jerry Kane, Assistant Professor of Information Systems, Carroll School of Management Boston College, sat down with me recently to discuss how companies can gauge the effectiveness of social media within their organizations. He provides his professional perspective on the future of social networking.

2 Responses to “Dishing with Diane: Jerry Kane shares his perspective on the power of social media”

  1. Joe Wehr says:

    Diane

    Nice interview with BC’s “wiki professor”. Thanks.

    What I wouldn’t do to swap places with my nephew, Joe Wehr, BC ‘10.

    Joe Wehr, BC ‘69

Leave a Reply

Read more

It’s Okay to Follow the Crowd!

So what’s all this talk of crowdsourcing anyway?

First, let’s ground ourselves on what we’re talking about when we refer to the term crowdsourcing. In general, we are talking about outsourcing a job or task to an undefined, generally large group or community. Naturally and fortunately, the Internet, by its very nature, makes this easier and highly scalable.

So what’s all this talk of crowdsourcing anyway?

First, let’s ground ourselves on what we’re talking about when we refer to the term crowdsourcing. In general, we are talking about outsourcing a job or task to an undefined, generally large group or community. Naturally and fortunately, the Internet, by its very nature, makes this easier and highly scalable.

Various models are still evolving, but good examples include intellectually challenging projects like those found on InnoCentive to the more rote style work that can be found at Amazon’s Mechanical Turk site. At its most rudimentary form, one could even argue that online auctions, which have been around for a while, are a form of crowdsourcing.

From a design standpoint, arguments have been made on both sides as whether crowdsourcing an online logo or web design cheapens the work of a designer. I, for one don’t believe so. In fact, in a sense, it serves as a catalyst for competition, which is ultimately good for the industry, good for customers, good for everyone. I see it as a 1+1=3 equation. In the models where there is only one deemed “winner,” as long as they are able to be contacted by the buyer, a single crowdsourcing project can easily benefit multiple designers. Winning a design or even simply interacting with the project leader/customer can also be the fast track to a new, ongoing relationship (i.e., new client) as well.

Because the crowdsourcing concept is still relatively new—well, in Internet time at least, I am anxiously watching to see how it will evolve and in particular, the clever ways in which it can be monetized. 

To experience the phenomenon for yourself, try Network Solutions’ new Freelance Logo Design service on the Network Solutions Storefront.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Dishing with Diane: Jeffrey Rayport on how great brands connect with their consumers

Jeffrey F. Rayport, currently an operating partner at Castanea Partners, formerly the founder and chairman of Marketspace and a Harvard Business School professor, recently paid me a visit in our Boston office. During his visit, we sat down to talk about the transformative power and evolution of digital media; strategies for marketers as we emerge from the recession; and how the greatest brands are delighting their customers by connecting with them at every level.

Jeffrey F. Rayport, currently an operating partner at Castanea Partners, formerly the founder and chairman of Marketspace and a Harvard Business School professor, recently paid me a visit in our Boston office. During his visit, we sat down to talk about the transformative power and evolution of digital media; strategies for marketers as we emerge from the recession; and how the greatest brands are delighting their customers by connecting with them at every level.

Leave a Reply

Read more