Posts Tagged ‘Global’

Vancouver 2010: Snowboarding preview

Now that the Super Bowl is over, you may find yourself looking forward to the pageantry of the Winter Olympics. Here’s who and what to look for in snowboarding this year…

Now that the Super Bowl is over, you may find yourself looking forward to the pageantry of the Winter Olympics. Here’s who and what to look for in snowboarding this year…

  • Lindsey Jacobellis – In the Turin Olympics Lindsey went a little too big off the last jump in the snowboard cross final and it cost her the gold. Afterwards the U.S. press criticized her for showing off and letting her country down. Lindsey would later explain how snowboarding is supposed to be fun and how she wanted to match the enthusiasm of the crowd with a stylish finish. Makes sense to me. Let’s see if Lindsey can redeem her honor.
  • “The Flying Tomato” – All sports have those athletes that come along and not only dominate a sport but also change its direction. What Tiger Woods is (was?) to golf, Shaun White is to snowboarding. I just want to say that I personally rock his signature line of Burton apparel and yes, I snowboard better because of it.
  • The Double Cork – It’s hard to describe this controversial halfpipe maneuver, so you’re going to have to click here to see it for yourself. Invented by Shaun White, it was deemed necessary for unseating him in Vancouver, but after Kevin Pearce fell hard and into a coma trying it in training, some called for a ban by the International Olympic Committee. No official ruling as of yet, so we’ll have to wait to see what happens.
  • Torah Bright – I felt this Australian phenom got robbed when she finished 5th in the halfpipe finals at the Turin Games. Since then, she won gold at the 2007 and 2009 X Games and is a favorite in this year’s Olympics. However Torah had to pull out of the 2010 X Games after suffering two concussions in three days in January—adding fuel to the fire to eighty-six certain maneuvers in Vancouver. Reports say she’s recovered physically, but as I can attest, concussions come with psychological effects as well.

I don’t know where I stand on banning maneuvers at the Olympics. On the one hand, I don’t want a governing body capping the level of competition in snowboarding. On the other, I realize each year this level gets more and more dangerous. What do you think?

5 Responses to “Vancouver 2010: Snowboarding preview”

  1. Sandra Atlas says:

    I tend to be conservative — so, I think that capping the competition can be a good thing, if it helps to saves lives and prevent traumatic injury. Sometimes, people will to do almost anything to make their statement to the world. Setting some reasonable limits might help to keep the sport safe and prevent devestating injury.

  2. I see your point, Sandra. To add to it, I wouldn’t want people tuning in with the hopes of seeing someone get hurt. That’s what the UFC is for!

  3. Adrian W. says:

    Capping the competition would hurt the sport of snowboarding. These athletes are the best at what they do, they are Olympians. Why should any one tell them that they shouldn’t push the limits of their sport? They are not going to go out there and try a trick they have never done before just so they can hurt themselves and get on television. They practice these tricks. If there were a cap on the sport, it would hurt the sport because people would get bored of watching the same tricks over and over. I’m sorry to say, injuries are part of any sport. They don’t put a cap on football because someone gets hurt do they? If people tune in because they want to see someone get hurt, they have a sick mind. Some people watch NASCAR races just for the wrecks, and NASCAR is capped. They are capped because they have restrictor plate races where they limit their top speed. Let the sport take care of itself. If people get hurt, people get hurt. That is what happens in sports.

  4. Thanks, Adrian, for representing the other side. I agree, banning the double cork would definitely affect “the sport” of snowboarding, but snowboarding itself would continue to evolve. Even if Shaun White wasn’t allowed to do the move in the Olympics AND the X Games, he’d still do it and it would get captured on video for all to see and emulate. I don’t know, maybe we just need better helmets.

  5. Adrian W. says:

    I agree Mike, those little shells they call helmets don’t help much. Keep in mind though, no helmet is going to stop someone from breaking their neck and becoming paralyzed. You can’t prevent athletes from performing with lots of safety regulations and you can’t let them go out there and risk their lives. Every sport in the world could be safer in a way, it’s just a matter of finding that common ground where people can agree that it’s not too dangerous and that it doesn’t take too much away from the sport.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Cultivating Insight and Innovation… One Adventure at a Time

I have a seemingly immodest confession: I was not surprised to win the Communispace Values Award for Adventure last winter. After all, how many people can say they started the previous year literally walking out of their burning home in Boston with just the clothes on their back and their beloved chocolate lab in tow, and ended it 3,000 miles away, living and working in London? From Day 1 to Day 365, it was a year of extreme risk (uprooting a US life and journeying to a new and unknown land) and extreme reward (the immense gratification of helping open a UK office for a globally expanding Communispace)—one which is likely (and in certain ways hopefully) not to be repeated. Indeed, my 2008 was replete with what I would term obvious adventure, the sort that has the subtlety of a sledgehammer… or a reality TV contestant. (Yes, if my 2008 were a person, it’d probably be “The Situation.”)

I have a seemingly immodest confession: I was not surprised to win the Communispace Values Award for Adventure last winter. After all, how many people can say they started the previous year literally walking out of their burning home in Boston with just the clothes on their back and their beloved chocolate lab in tow, and ended it 3,000 miles away, living and working in London? From Day 1 to Day 365, it was a year of extreme risk (uprooting a US life and journeying to a new and unknown land) and extreme reward (the immense gratification of helping open a UK office for a globally expanding Communispace)—one which is likely (and in certain ways hopefully) not to be repeated. Indeed, my 2008 was replete with what I would term obvious adventure, the sort that has the subtlety of a sledgehammer… or a reality TV contestant. (Yes, if my 2008 were a person, it’d probably be “The Situation.”) 

Yet to say I was unsurprised is not to imply that I was not flattered or humbled. If there is one thing Communispace understands at a very visceral level, it’s adventure. I watch with awe everyday as my colleagues take risks, innovate at the speed of light, and push themselves, each other, and our clients to be better, smarter, more connected, more involved. Every day, with passion, dedication, and humor, my colleagues find new ways to unearth game-changing insights for our clients, new ways to move the marketplace to unprecedented heights, and new ways to make the company itself one everyone is proud to be a part of (and you will not meet a prouder bunch!).

But this is not flashy adventure; it is not self-congratulatory; it is not immodest; it is not so glaringly obvious as a burning building or a new London office space. No, adventure at Communispace is so subtle and subterranean at times, so constant and steady, I would liken it to a hot spring, a continuous stream of energy that infuses and seeps warmly into everything Communispace does. Yes, there are occasional geysers: opening up Asia Pacific offices, launching new versions of our community software, being named by Forrester as the Full-Service Market Research Online Community Leader or winning two Forrester Groundswell Awards (that last is not an intentional pun, I swear!). But most of the time, adventure bubbles right beneath the surface in everything my colleagues do: crafting client research agendas, projecting the voice of the customer into a room of executives, writing a whitepaper on what it means to listen, building sophisticated technology infrastructure, participating enthusiastically in company golf outings and The Communispace Follies, and planning for all that 2010 and beyond will bring.

And so, as we usher in a new year, born aloft by these continuous bubbles of adventure, I look forward to passing my fiery torch to one of my amazingly deserved colleagues…to a geyser of applause.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Montreux, Pecha Kucha, and 21st Century Market Research: Highlights of the 2009 ESOMAR Congress

At this time last month I was in Montreux, Switzerland, attending the annual ESOMAR Congress. After four days of schmoozing, over-eating, and lots of listening—and after several weeks of reflection—some recurring themes have continued to resonate with me; ones that are currently influencing how we understand and conduct market research.

At this time last month I was in Montreux, Switzerland, attending the annual ESOMAR Congress. After four days of schmoozing, over-eating, and lots of listening—and after several weeks of reflection—some recurring themes have continued to resonate with me; ones that are currently influencing how we understand and conduct market research.

Diverse perspectives expand our viewpoints and uncover insights.
Communispace was invited to represent North America in the “global expedition” Pecha Kucha session, which was challenging, a lot of fun, and also eye opening. Each region presented their perspective on the global financial crisis—we heard, for example, that Switzerland (representing Europe) was alarmed by their nearly 4% unemployment rate (which is several points lower than what we have seen in the U.S. in over 40 years), and the representative from Nigeria reminded the audience that Africa has been in a recession for 100 years! While the fact of global diversity is not new, the contrast among these regional perspectives was refreshing, and underscored the importance of actively seeking situations that challenge our assumptions. No matter how well we think we might understand a topic or consumer group, we need experiences that shake us out of our own frames of reference, remind us that there are multiple realities, and inform us about unique and specific contexts.

Technology-supported, humanistic methods are critical for engagement and will be the next generation of market research. This was a resounding theme in the Congress’ interactive Master Classes and formal presentations; and one task for market research going forward is to embrace a “21st Century” approach to insight generation and actionable research:

table

These approaches are becoming more main-stream, yet they still challenge us in fundamental ways. The industry is witnessing—and online communities are integral to—the emergence of a new market research model. These humanistic, large-scale, technology-driven methods offer huge potential not only for the creative and innovative ways we can engage people and measure behavior, but for the quality of the data itself. Embracing these methods, however, requires researchers to also accept reduced power differentials, self-selecting samples, collaboration between participants and researchers, combining multiple methods and media, transparency, and the particular quandary of having a theoretically infinite supply of conversation snippets (or video, or still images, or collages, or what have you) to analyze and mine for insights. 

But are researchers ready to step down from behind the one-way mirror, doff their lab coats, and just be human? 

Our experience suggests that they are—at least a forward-thinking, vocal minority; Communispace clients are innovating along these lines every day, delegates from across the globe provided examples of such at the Congress, and council members indicated they were revising ESOMAR guidelines to incorporate reliable and ethical uses of online methods. As Julie and I state at the end of our Pecha Kucha, what consumers and researchers need now is “a level playing field where neither of us has a lot of power but we both have just enough to learn from and honor each other’s perspective.”

Leave a Reply

Read more

American Pants vs. British Trousers: The importance of speaking the “same language”

George Bernard Shaw once said that “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” Before I moved to London in September of 2008, I would have scoffed at such a sentiment: how can speaking the same language be divisive? Surely, of all the ways an American might need to adjust to living in a new country, speaking English would be the least hindrance.

George Bernard Shaw once said that “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” Before I moved to London in September of 2008, I would have scoffed at such a sentiment: how can speaking the same language be divisive? Surely, of all the ways an American might need to adjust to living in a new country, speaking English would be the least hindrance.

However, George got it exactly right. Because of that shared “same language,” often there is the tendency to think that Brits and Americans are fundamentally the same, and communicate the same. We all would perhaps concede the cultural bits: that we have different governments and schools; our social mores can differ at times; and often enough, we do shop at different stores, eat different foods, and care about different brands, to name just a few. We might remark on each other’s accents, chuckle over the quirky differences in our vocabularies (e.g., car trunk = boot, elevator = lift, and pants = trousers) or think it’s cute when the British ‘favour’ has a ‘u’ or ‘realise’ that Americans spell ‘realize’ with a zee (or, rather, a zed). But would that really hinder our ability to truly communicate?

The short answer is—you betcha.

Now, I don’t mean to overstate my point. Certainly Americans (or English speakers of whatever ilk) could be and are very effective facilitators of British communities, or vice versa. But to maximize (or maximise, as the case may be) your chances of creating a successful community, one of the key ingredients is setting the appropriate tone, and a lot of that is language. That’s an obvious observation when thinking about how we talk to high net worth investors versus 18–24-year-old trendsetting young males, but less so when contemplating, say, talking to British versus American moms. However, tone is certainly at least partially about vocabulary and spelling, and in the aggregate, there is a lot to learn about how we use and spell words differently (for example, after living in London for a year, I still can forget British moms are mums!).

Okay, Jennifer, I take your point, you might say. But if we learned the lingo and the spelling, we’d be fine, right?
Well, you’d certainly be better off, and your British community members would appreciate it. But, there is more to the equation of creating a community in which those British mums, say, would be fully comfortable (a state which generates the best insights). A lot of the social cues that enable true connection are embedded in how we use language—how we string all of those words together to express sentiment. For example, during the past year living in London, I have witnessed firsthand the relative conservatism of my British friends and colleagues, and noted their general lack of, well, effusiveness!

The high energy, exuberant language Americans use with each other in daily life tends to set the British back on their heels a bit. When I ask Brits what they think of Americans (I tend to do so a lot, because, like most Americans, I ask a lot of forward questions that have a tendency to embarrass my friends across the pond), I get the sort of fond yet exasperated smile one might reserve for an eager golden retriever who’s knocked over a lamp with a wagging tail, “Americans are great… but you can be, well, loud” they sometimes say. “And so friendly and smile-y. All those teeth.” Such friendliness is not fully a plus; for Brits it can be off-putting. And those questions I ask… well, if I were British I’d probably know how to ask them so as not to be seen as forward, or know not to ask them at all. And what are we doing in a community if not asking questions?

So, when it comes to convening your international communities, as you are taking good heed of our recent global research that indicates that companies should consider and accommodate cultural differences in how they recruit and engage community members, ask questions, and interpret insights, don’t forget that may mean making sure that you have a very effective local team of facilitators, even if you all speak the “same language.”

5 Responses to “American Pants vs. British Trousers: The importance of speaking the “same language””

  1. Diane Hessan says:

    Jen, I LOVE this post. We all need to be humble when we say, “we can manage global communities!!!” — and don’t people in the UK detest those exclamation points?

    I also like how you said “I take your point.” Americans would not say that; we’d say, ‘I see your point”, or “I hear you”. :)

    Thanks for an enlightening post.

  2. Jennifer Adams says:

    Thanks, Di. And you are SO right about the exclamation points, you just don’t see them anywhere in the UK. Even the sensational headlines of the gossip rags forgo that most effusive of punctuations. It’s a distinct tonal difference that you can see and hear, both in person and in writing. Although perhaps not when they are talking about football. :)

  3. Peter Kim says:

    And also interesting that you use the phrase “you betcha,” which might be as attributed to Alaskans now as “all set” would be to New Englanders. Wondering about how you account for cultural differences in the 50 states, which must be even more complex than US vs. UK vs. CA vs. AU vs. ZA.

  4. Jennifer Adams says:

    Hi Peter, thanks for your comment. You raise a very interesting and provocative point about regional differences. I think you are correct, there are certainly cultural, linguistic and tonal differences between regions in every country, and should a company desire to delve deeply into a local market as opposed to a national one, I think the same basic premise holds: facilitating in the “same language” can only help in garnering rich insights.

  5. Eloise says:

    Not to diminish Peter’s comment but being British I’m motivated to wonder about only 50 cultural differences in all that land mass. I started writing a list and came up with 30 distinct cultural groups in the UK before metaphorically I paused for breath from the frantic typing. After a few more moments it was well over 50. Some of them are probably fiddly beyond compare – you could stand in the right place in Liverpool and be surrounded by Scousers, Scallies and Woolybacks and probably never tell the difference unless you’re in the know.

    But saying “Oh they’re all British” (or even more annoyingly they’re all English) when you’re talking about S. Welsh valley girl, a Scottish highland lass, an Essex girl, and a Geordie lass say… all same age, same gender and otherwise very different and all talking very different versions of “English” English is just as likely to lead to confusion as addressing us conservative Brits with too many exclamation marks.

Leave a Reply

Read more

When “Winging It” Doesn’t Work

There are many things that make me proud of Communispace, but towards the top of my list is that we spend nearly $1MM/year on research. Although this is not a revenue-generating part of the company, we invest this money to keep on the cutting edge of relevant issues and trends affecting our clients, and to answer our clients’ questions with integrity.

There are many things that make me proud of Communispace, but towards the top of my list is that we spend nearly $1MM/year on research. Although this is not a revenue-generating part of the company, we invest this money to keep on the cutting edge of relevant issues and trends affecting our clients, and to answer our clients’ questions with integrity. 

Consider these questions, which we get on a daily basis:

  • Who ARE these people in your communities? The Lonely Hearts Club?
  • Aren’t these people biased in their answers?
  • What level of participation can I reasonably expect?
  • Are men different from women in how they participate?
  • Is this stuff statistically significant?
  • Why have 400 people in your communities instead of 4,000 or 40,000?
  • What are the special practices involved in Hispanic or African-American communities?
  • Why give consumers incentives to participate?
  • What works for youth communities?
  • Are community members more creative than the average consumer?
  • What are you hearing about the Green Revolution?

The work done by our research and innovation team has helped us answer these questions and more, eliminating the need for us to “wing it” with our clients.

Recently, the team has completed two fascinating pieces of work that have changed my view of the world. The first, C-Suite to Main Street: Bridging the Divide, underscores the differences between the lives of executives and the consumers they target during this tough economy; it reminded me of the bubble many of us live in and what a terrible time it is to lose touch with customers. 

In the newly released second study, Breakthroughs without Borders, we explore the richness of our multicultural communities—which busts myths about what a “household” is or how “consumers want to be in control.” We have two versions of these reports—one for you quant jocks who need the detail, and an easy reading booklet version that you can take to the beach and impress your friends with.

Happy reading, and please send us your feedback!

One Response to “When “Winging It” Doesn’t Work”

  1. Ann Wright Pitts says:

    I really liked your line graphs of similarities between China and the US. Very enlightening. Thanks! Ann

Leave a Reply

Read more

And the Sign Says…

Burma Shave burst on the scene in 1925 with their now famous billboard series saluting shaving cream along roadsides throughout the country; thanks to the billboard brilliance, the message spread and Burma Shave survived the Great Depression with signs sticking soundly through 1963.

Flash forward to today.

Burma Shave burst on the scene in 1925 with their now famous billboard series saluting shaving cream along roadsides throughout the country; thanks to the billboard brilliance, the message spread and Burma Shave survived the Great Depression with signs sticking soundly through 1963.  

Flash forward to today.

Working to whittle down automobile fatality totals springing from a soaked season, the local government in Papkura, New Zealand introduced a billboard which bleeds when it pours. The advertisement, featuring a picture of a child, gushes red liquid from a boy’s nose, eyes and ears when the heavens open up. Despite directing drivers’ eyes away from the road, a seemingly counterintuitive call, since establishing the blood-bath billboard the town has seen zero mortal mishaps.

Greenpeace secured their own shockwaves, as climbers scaled Mount Rushmore on Thursday, launching a large sign pleading with the President. Its message — “America honors leaders not politicians: Stop Global Warming” and an unfinished portrait of Obama — was barely visible as it was whipped by wind, but still managed to build buzz. 

Burma’s bid to capture (and hold attention), proved as sound as the Kiwi’s call to slow down, suggesting signs can still have an impact. Despite drastic differences in message and execution, ranging from innocuous to provocative, both proved effective in speaking to seers; more importantly, each earned a lasting impact and drove onlookers to engage in a desired deed.

While Greenpeace will assuredly garner 30 seconds of airtime on news outlets from around the country, will their sign stunt secure a similar long-standing salute minus an equally clear message and concise call to action?

As always, we leave you with a little levity to help you whistle while you work  through the last of the week. Enjoy your 48 hours of freedom.

One Response to “And the Sign Says…”

  1. Diane Hessan says:

    Rocky, a great post as always. And, do you know that I always start my weekends by listening to your tunes?

Leave a Reply

Read more

Monkey Business

Meet Ida. The now famous 47-million-year-old primate fossil sent shock waves world-round with her formal introduction this week: “MEDIA ALERT: WORLD-RENOWNED SCIENTISTS REVEAL A REVOLUTIONARY SCIENTIFIC FIND THAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING.” In other words, scientists suggest the little gal is ‘The Missing Link’, the earliest ancestor of all living monkeys, apes and people.

Leaving the impact on Darwin’s debate (and the all-cap announcement, really?) aside, the message was meant for the world at large and seemingly boasted enough bravado to carry it across the coasts of all seven continents…

Meet Ida. The now famous 47-million-year-old primate fossil sent shock waves world-round with her formal introduction this week: “MEDIA ALERT: WORLD-RENOWNED SCIENTISTS REVEAL A REVOLUTIONARY SCIENTIFIC FIND THAT WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING.” In other words, scientists suggest the little gal is ‘The Missing Link’, the earliest ancestor of all living monkeys, apes and people.

Leaving the impact on Darwin’s debate (and the all-cap announcement, really?) aside, the message was meant for the world at large and seemingly boasted enough bravado to carry it across the coasts of all seven continents. The unveiling of the fossil came as part of a carefully-orchestrated publicity campaign at the American Museum of Natural History; a History Channel film on the discovery will air next week; a book release and a slew of other documentaries will follow — unusual for scientific discoveries.

Jorn Hurum, a Norwegian paleontologist involved in Ida’s discovery, positioned the publicity by suggesting: “Any pop band is doing the same thing.”

But here’s the problem: in their quest to generate greatness on a global scale, Hurum & Company may have overstated the significance of their skeleton. “It’s an extraordinarily complete, wonderful specimen but it’s not telling us too much that we didn’t know before,” paleoanthropologist Elwyn Simons of Duke University said of the fossil.

University of Michigan paleontologist Philip Gingerich, one of Dr Hurum’s co-authors, said the team would have preferred to publish in a more rigorous journal such as Science or Nature. Dr Gingerich told The Wall Street Journal: “There was a TV company involved and time pressure. We’ve been pushed to finish the study. It’s not how I like to do science”.

The extensive hype heaped on the findings has shifted focus from purpose to presentation, thereby diminishing both. The question the scientific work must now withstand: did the discovery drive the story, or did the desire for splash refine the results?

On a more local level, welcome to Memorial Day Weekend Warriors; we salute our fallen soldiers and an extended weekend stay with our standard song – happy hamburgers and hotdogs!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Going Global and Getting Real Results

We sat down this week with one of our clients who has tons of experience with global communities: Cassandra Jeyaram, PhD, Social Marketing Manager, Global Consumer Marketing at IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group).

We sat down this week with one of our clients who has tons of experience with global communities: Cassandra Jeyaram, PhD, Social Marketing Manager, Global Consumer Marketing at IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group).

Andrew: First, just so our readers have adequate background, can you tell us about your position at IHG and what Social Marketing Manager means?

Cassandra from IHGCassandra: The position was created to engage and build long term relationships with our customers. We’re committed to directly engaging with our customers to build those relationships and in some instances use social marketing technologies to give them a seat at the table when making business decisions.

I’m responsible for identifying ways we can leverage social marketing technologies to help us “put heads into beds.” All of our social marketing efforts focus on the tactics that get us results and have a clear ROI.

Andrew: As you know, this is global week on Verbatim, where we are highlighting some of the great work our clients have done in a number of multinational communities. So, before we turn to a results story, can you tell us about your global communities and why you feel they are right for IHG?

Cassandra: Absolutely! We have 44 million customers in our loyalty program, Priority Club Rewards, and many of those live and travel outside the United States. Some of the expanding markets, such as the Asia and the Middle East, are critical to our success. If you are truly committed to the social media sphere and giving your customers representation, then you have to reach out to where they are and where they travel. We’ve identified and followed our best customers and found ourselves with two non-US communities, one that’s truly global for our top tier members, and one for our UK base. Our third community focuses more on the Americas.

Andrew: You have hotels around the world and you’re hosting community members from 47 countries. Despite the inevitable cultural there are striking commonalities among members. Certainly some of those are about love of travel and the desire to make the PCR program the best it can be. But do you have a story about using members’ contributions in a way that’s really different and that binds them together. Can you share that story?

Cassandra: Sure, we noticed, in all our communities, that members loved sharing photos from their travels—and some of these photographs were truly remarkable. They loved sharing them, loved viewing each others’ images, and loved the way it gave them inspiration to travel to destinations pictured. At some point we realized there was a great opportunity to use these member-generated images in our direct mail pieces and in other promotional material.

By using our members’ photos in our global communications, we’re able to give them not only financial currency (with PCR points), but social currency – prestige and notoriety among their peers in the community but with other travelers as well. We saw this as a way to communicate something real that would resonant to members who look at these ads and promotional pieces. That was our hypothesis—that photos taken by real members of real places that interest them will resonate more emotionally than stock photos of properties.

Andrew: And you have some fairly strong results, right?

Cassandra: Yes! We have been using member-generated photos long enough now to have some analytics in place and we’ve realized a 24% incremental lift in revenue in response to the marketing pieces that use member generated photos. And the great thing is that we’re able to be global but execute locally as our members upload photos from around the world.

Andrew: Thanks for sharing that remarkable story. Any parting words for those heading out into the wilderness of social media marketing?

Cassandra: Be transparent and make a commitment. One of the biggest mistakes I see companies making is that they’ll set up a Facebook page or community and then ignore it. Social marketing tools are designed to build and foster relationships. They need nurturing and attention. Failure to connect and engage in a transparent way can lead to extremely disappointing results – not to mention wasted resources.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Bringing Customers Into the Company

Scientific research is undergoing rapid transformation and becoming a highly competitive global enterprise. As a provider of research intelligence to this community, we need to keep up with that transformation and involve our customers constantly in our business decisions. But with over 6 million researchers spread across the world and with us working primarily out of Amsterdam and New York, we have to be creative in capturing that voice of the customer without spending most of our lives at the airport.

Scientific research is undergoing rapid transformation and becoming a highly competitive global enterprise. As a provider of research intelligence to this community, we need to keep up with that transformation and involve our customers constantly in our business decisions. But with over 6 million researchers spread across the world and with us working primarily out of Amsterdam and New York, we have to be creative in capturing that voice of the customer without spending most of our lives at the airport. We thought to ourselves, “If we can’t bring the company to our customers, maybe we can try bringing our customers to the company instead.” And thus we launched Innovation Explorers: 2 online communities uniting 300 researchers and 150 librarians from over 69 countries.

We see our communities as a microcosm of the broader research landscape and we’re learning from that engagement. One emerging – and paradoxical – theme that many researchers are facing is that they need to collaborate in order to compete with one another. As one Explorer commented, “So many people are working on the same topic e.g….cancer, HIV, heart diseases… they are competing with others to publish first.” At the same time, multi-disciplinary research is increasingly mandated by funding bodies as real-world problems span across disciplines and geographic boundaries and researchers are compelled to collaborate to get their research done.

This emerging theme has implications for our offerings to researchers. What is perceived as a competitive intelligence tool by some is regarded as a collaboration tool by others. In the world which our users inhabit, collaboration and competition are two sides of the same coin. And that dual perception impacts how we develop and market our solutions going forward.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Human Search Engine? What are you talking about?

Jimmy and Rindy discuss how the Chinese are using social media. Check out these links and join the conversation:

Tongxue – A popular Chinese social networking site
Xiaonei – A Chinese version of Facebook

Jimmy and Rindy discuss how the Chinese are using social media. Check out these links and join the conversation:

Tongxue – A popular Chinese social networking site

Xiaonei – A Chinese version of Facebook

6 Responses to “Human Search Engine? What are you talking about?”

  1. Anne Demedts says:

    Nice! I really enjoyed listening to this story in Chinese.

    A little scary to think that the power of the people could be used in less clear-cut situations too.

  2. Jimmy says:

    Anne, you bring up a good point. While researching examples for this post, we found many cases where “human search engines” were used for the purpose of bullying innocent people. On the other hand, there were cases where people put it to good use, exposing corrupt officials or uncovering scandals.

  3. Claire-Voe Ocampo says:

    This was a fantastic video. Thanks for sharing guys! :)

  4. Ric Vatner says:

    Very interesting comment. Social media has really taken off in China. One social media web site in China recently reported a profit for 2008 that was 3 times the turn over of Facebook.

  5. Nicole Adriance says:

    Great video, interesting story! Rindy, you are a fast talker! ;)
    While living in southern China 5 years ago I was amazed at how quickly ideas were spread via text messaging. Oftentimes, this encouraged like-minded thought in the “public space” while discussion on varying opinions were reserved for private conversation. I wonder if the proliferation of social media will encourage debate in traditional communities or simply exaggerate group think.

  6. Tej Balgobin says:

    What a great idea to tell this story in Chinese! The story brings a twist to the classic saying “there’s power in groups”. A little scary too to think social media can be used this way. Think of what could be next!

Leave a Reply

Read more