Posts Tagged ‘Language’

Excuse me, but you’re Techno-Babbling

techno-babble“Techno-babble” is a term used to describe the fantastic way a storyteller can string together technical words and phrases to create a fictional (and usually ridiculous) explanation to provide entertainment (or more likely, to plug plot holes). As a science fiction enthusiast (geek), I enjoy listening to it explain the unexplainable. Whether it was the chief engineer of the Starship Enterprise “re-routing primary power relays to boost warp gain” or CTU’s Chloe O’Brian “opening an IP socket to a secure volume on a node cluster in a server farm,” techno-babble could help you pretend the impossible was possible.

techno-babble“Techno-babble” is a term used to describe the fantastic way a storyteller can string together technical words and phrases to create a fictional (and usually ridiculous) explanation to provide entertainment (or more likely, to plug plot holes). As a science fiction enthusiast (geek), I enjoy listening to it explain the unexplainable. Whether it was the chief engineer of the Starship Enterprise “re-routing primary power relays to boost warp gain” or CTU’s Chloe O’Brian “opening an IP socket to a secure volume on a node cluster in a server farm,” techno-babble could help you pretend the impossible was possible.

People often use a lot of buzz words and phrases in real life as well, but too often don’t understand what they really mean—creating a real life techno-babble. I thought of this recently when I received an email from a supplier who at one time I used regularly. My contact there wanted to re-connect. The message was a form letter about 1,200 words long and full of industry keywords, covering every possible technology offering in the charted galaxy. 

But what it didn’t cover was why I should care. The reason I stopped using this supplier was because every time I attempted to enter into a meaningful discussion to understand how I could solve a problem, my contact could not provide me with any useful answers—I would always be pushed off to some “technical advisor” who was rarely available. It was clear to me that my contact didn’t really understand the technologies they were boasting about in sales pitches. So, I found one at another supplier who did.

My point? Simple—but it’s too often overlooked (or worse) ignored—know your customers’ language before trying to use it. Otherwise they will see right through you and go elsewhere. As Mr. Spock might say, you’d “be responding in gibberish.”

Keep the techno-babble where it belongs, in fantasy (or playful banter). In the meantime, feel free to initiate electronic communication and relay your opinions.

End Transmission.

2 Responses to “Excuse me, but you’re Techno-Babbling”

  1. Matt says:

    Check out the Retro Encabulator at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w – certain to satisfy all of your wildest technobable dreams….

  2. Jack Cahill says:

    Thanks, Matt. That is clearly the most poetic use of techno-babble I have yet seen. Brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Read more

American Pants vs. British Trousers: The importance of speaking the “same language”

George Bernard Shaw once said that “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” Before I moved to London in September of 2008, I would have scoffed at such a sentiment: how can speaking the same language be divisive? Surely, of all the ways an American might need to adjust to living in a new country, speaking English would be the least hindrance.

George Bernard Shaw once said that “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” Before I moved to London in September of 2008, I would have scoffed at such a sentiment: how can speaking the same language be divisive? Surely, of all the ways an American might need to adjust to living in a new country, speaking English would be the least hindrance.

However, George got it exactly right. Because of that shared “same language,” often there is the tendency to think that Brits and Americans are fundamentally the same, and communicate the same. We all would perhaps concede the cultural bits: that we have different governments and schools; our social mores can differ at times; and often enough, we do shop at different stores, eat different foods, and care about different brands, to name just a few. We might remark on each other’s accents, chuckle over the quirky differences in our vocabularies (e.g., car trunk = boot, elevator = lift, and pants = trousers) or think it’s cute when the British ‘favour’ has a ‘u’ or ‘realise’ that Americans spell ‘realize’ with a zee (or, rather, a zed). But would that really hinder our ability to truly communicate?

The short answer is—you betcha.

Now, I don’t mean to overstate my point. Certainly Americans (or English speakers of whatever ilk) could be and are very effective facilitators of British communities, or vice versa. But to maximize (or maximise, as the case may be) your chances of creating a successful community, one of the key ingredients is setting the appropriate tone, and a lot of that is language. That’s an obvious observation when thinking about how we talk to high net worth investors versus 18–24-year-old trendsetting young males, but less so when contemplating, say, talking to British versus American moms. However, tone is certainly at least partially about vocabulary and spelling, and in the aggregate, there is a lot to learn about how we use and spell words differently (for example, after living in London for a year, I still can forget British moms are mums!).

Okay, Jennifer, I take your point, you might say. But if we learned the lingo and the spelling, we’d be fine, right?
Well, you’d certainly be better off, and your British community members would appreciate it. But, there is more to the equation of creating a community in which those British mums, say, would be fully comfortable (a state which generates the best insights). A lot of the social cues that enable true connection are embedded in how we use language—how we string all of those words together to express sentiment. For example, during the past year living in London, I have witnessed firsthand the relative conservatism of my British friends and colleagues, and noted their general lack of, well, effusiveness!

The high energy, exuberant language Americans use with each other in daily life tends to set the British back on their heels a bit. When I ask Brits what they think of Americans (I tend to do so a lot, because, like most Americans, I ask a lot of forward questions that have a tendency to embarrass my friends across the pond), I get the sort of fond yet exasperated smile one might reserve for an eager golden retriever who’s knocked over a lamp with a wagging tail, “Americans are great… but you can be, well, loud” they sometimes say. “And so friendly and smile-y. All those teeth.” Such friendliness is not fully a plus; for Brits it can be off-putting. And those questions I ask… well, if I were British I’d probably know how to ask them so as not to be seen as forward, or know not to ask them at all. And what are we doing in a community if not asking questions?

So, when it comes to convening your international communities, as you are taking good heed of our recent global research that indicates that companies should consider and accommodate cultural differences in how they recruit and engage community members, ask questions, and interpret insights, don’t forget that may mean making sure that you have a very effective local team of facilitators, even if you all speak the “same language.”

5 Responses to “American Pants vs. British Trousers: The importance of speaking the “same language””

  1. Diane Hessan says:

    Jen, I LOVE this post. We all need to be humble when we say, “we can manage global communities!!!” — and don’t people in the UK detest those exclamation points?

    I also like how you said “I take your point.” Americans would not say that; we’d say, ‘I see your point”, or “I hear you”. :)

    Thanks for an enlightening post.

  2. Jennifer Adams says:

    Thanks, Di. And you are SO right about the exclamation points, you just don’t see them anywhere in the UK. Even the sensational headlines of the gossip rags forgo that most effusive of punctuations. It’s a distinct tonal difference that you can see and hear, both in person and in writing. Although perhaps not when they are talking about football. :)

  3. Peter Kim says:

    And also interesting that you use the phrase “you betcha,” which might be as attributed to Alaskans now as “all set” would be to New Englanders. Wondering about how you account for cultural differences in the 50 states, which must be even more complex than US vs. UK vs. CA vs. AU vs. ZA.

  4. Jennifer Adams says:

    Hi Peter, thanks for your comment. You raise a very interesting and provocative point about regional differences. I think you are correct, there are certainly cultural, linguistic and tonal differences between regions in every country, and should a company desire to delve deeply into a local market as opposed to a national one, I think the same basic premise holds: facilitating in the “same language” can only help in garnering rich insights.

  5. Eloise says:

    Not to diminish Peter’s comment but being British I’m motivated to wonder about only 50 cultural differences in all that land mass. I started writing a list and came up with 30 distinct cultural groups in the UK before metaphorically I paused for breath from the frantic typing. After a few more moments it was well over 50. Some of them are probably fiddly beyond compare – you could stand in the right place in Liverpool and be surrounded by Scousers, Scallies and Woolybacks and probably never tell the difference unless you’re in the know.

    But saying “Oh they’re all British” (or even more annoyingly they’re all English) when you’re talking about S. Welsh valley girl, a Scottish highland lass, an Essex girl, and a Geordie lass say… all same age, same gender and otherwise very different and all talking very different versions of “English” English is just as likely to lead to confusion as addressing us conservative Brits with too many exclamation marks.

Leave a Reply

Read more

The Swear Jar

“Only I didn’t say ‘Fudge.’ I said THE word, the big one, the queen-mother of dirty words, the ‘F-dash-dash-dash’ word!”

Researchers from the school of psychology at Britain’s Keele University recanted generations of grade school lessons this week as they unveiled findings on famous four-letter words (along with other nefarious notables); as it turns out, invoking profanities provides genuine physical relief from pain.

“Only I didn’t say ‘Fudge.’ I said THE word, the big one, the queen-mother of dirty words, the ‘F-dash-dash-dash’ word!”

Researchers from the school of psychology at Britain’s Keele University recanted generations of grade school lessons this week as they unveiled findings on famous four-letter words (along with other nefarious notables); as it turns out, invoking profanities provides genuine physical relief from pain.

The study split a sample of 128 subjects; while both groups were asked to hold a hand in a tub of ice water for as long as possible, only one group was given a go-ahead to curse through the course.

The profanity population prevailed, thus proving a link between swearing and an increase in pain tolerance.

But beware the baseless blasphemy. In the study, swearing stymied the perception of pain more strongly in women than in men. According to Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, this phenomenon may be attributed to the fact men swear more than women in daily life – which may have the sad side effect of dulling the dose of the painkiller: “[For women] I suspect that swearing retains more of an emotional punch because it has not been overused.”

While the findings verify the virility of vernacular, they also raise a red flag with regard to repetition. In an age of multi-million dollar ad campaigns, when marketers strive to make the most of their media buys by playing the same spot on repeat, is it possible overuse is undoing their primary point? By hammering home the message (and again, and again), are advertisers actually muting their meaning?

As we salute the swear jars standing on counters around the world, let us focus on another four letter word as we head into the weekend: happy FUNK ya’ll.

3 Responses to “The Swear Jar”

  1. Diane Hessan says:

    Hey Rocky — I think you have a point about repetition. This morning, while watching the news, I counted 8 TV commercials in a row that were all about discounts. It made me feel that everyone has sales and that I should just ignore what I was watching. No differentiation. Nothing to notice. (And I like that funky music.)

  2. Leaving aside the attack of advertisers using the same message, which I agree with Di (everyone has lowered prices, big, big sales, huge discounts and the like), but in the age of instant media and shortened attention spans, does it still work to cram the same commercial down consumers throats 100 times in a single sitting?

  3. Dan says:

    S***, that was a good article!
    Do you find my compliments any less sincere because you’ve heard me use that word before?

    In all seriousness, I couldn’t agree more; I’ve become so numb to the repetitive nature of nearly every advertisement that is force-fed down my throat on a daily basis. I think that’s why commercials like the E-Trade baby (new concept, new faces, different language) are so memorable and successful. However, now that they’ve done it over and over, it may start to lose it’s appeal… (who am I kidding, when that baby busted out his blackberry and took a call from his girlfriend, I was loving it!)

Leave a Reply

Read more

Making Meaning: Listening in the age of a million words

Did you know there’s a word for that witty retort you wish you made at the time, but thought of after the moment had passed? There is. It’s “tintiddle” Great word, but I don’t know anyone who uses it.

On Wednesday, June 10th, the Global Language Monitor announced that the English language had reached its one-millionth word. Congratulations English, you’re complicated, hard to learn, and rife with potential misunderstanding.

Did you know there’s a word for that witty retort you wish you made at the time, but thought of after the moment had passed? There is. It’s “tintiddle” Great word, but I don’t know anyone who uses it.

On Wednesday, June 10th, the Global Language Monitor announced that the English language had reached its one-millionth word. Congratulations English, you’re complicated, hard to learn, and rife with potential misunderstanding. 

I’ll admit it: the millionth word is stressing me out. We’re a company of professional listeners. It’s crucial we understand both what someone says and how they say it.  Fortunately, the key to being a successful listener is not in the size of one’s vocabulary, but in the strength of one’s relationships. 

Getting to know members in a community over time, you can identify subtle differences in the way they respond and engage. You know when a typically jovial and unselfconscious member takes the time to provide elegant and detailed feedback. (It’s a lot like when your mother uses your first and middle name to get your attention.) In communities, the message and the medium are tightly coupled. Do members use slang or is their language formal, impassioned, abbreviated, verbose? 

Ultimately, finding the illuminating insight at the crossroads of what’s being said and how it’s being said is only possible in intimate relationships—the kind you build over time, the kind that distinguishes a group from a community.

P.S. Let’s be honest…a million words is a lot of pressure. I don’t know about you, but I feel compelled to up my game. Here are a few choice nuggets I hope to work into my vocabulary:

  1. pettifogger: a petty, unscrupulous lawyer
  2. raillery: good-humored banter or teasing repartee
  3. bouleversement: complete overthrow; a reversal
  4. perorate: to conclude or sum up a long discourse; also, to speak at length
  5. mephitic: offensive to the smell; also, noxious.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Creativity and Innovation: Embracing Happy Accidents

Do limitations enhance or dampen creativity?

Happy AccidentsThis question, first posed to me by a college admission board, is one that I have returned to many times—toiling over a printing press as an art student, exploring social barriers to organizational learning in my doctoral work, and in my current role at Communispace. Nowadays, this question seems more relevant than ever: We need to creatively re-imagine our social systems—finance, government, education, healthcare and business—with limited resources. How do we do more with less?

In my college essay, I argued that limitations were necessary for creativity. And my experience with art reinforced this stance.

Do limitations enhance or dampen creativity?

Happy Accidents

This question, first posed to me by a college admission board, is one that I have returned to many  times—toiling over a printing press as an art student, exploring social barriers to organizational learning in my doctoral work, and in my current role at Communispace.  Nowadays, this question seems more relevant than ever: We need to creatively re-imagine our social systems—finance, government, education, healthcare and business—with limited resources.  How do we do more with less?

In my college essay, I argued that limitations were necessary for creativity.  And my experience with art reinforced this stance.  Working within the constraints of specific media—mushing goopy oil paint across a canvas, making unintended gouges in woodcuts or etchings—often resulted in “happy accidents”: new ideas or techniques that organically emerged.  And sometimes lack of resources—no money for paint—led me to discover new pallets out of necessity (e.g., the color yellow!). Wired Magazine’s Scott Dadich, similarly argues that fewer resources lead to better decisions and that the restrictions of the editorial page enable creativity.

Happy accidents are harder to nurture in everyday organizational life.  Harvard’s Teresa Amabile has studied creativity “in the wild” and her analysis of 12,000 journal entries illuminates creativity barriers in the workplace.  Hectic distractions prevent people from deeply engaging in problems, competition among peers undermines open debate, downsizing provokes fear…and climates of fear do not support beak-through thinking (creativity spikes after a day of “happiness”, and languishes in times of uncertainty).

Last year I interviewed Communispace clients that were championing listening and innovation; one quality their companies all shared was a culture open to new ideas and perspectives.  Embracing innovation means embracing uncertainty, creative “dry spells”, and failure as well.  Companies must innovate while staying profitable and competitive; to do so they need established “safe havens” for creative work.

At Communispace, demands have increased for communities explicitly focused on new product development and innovation.  And we have best practices to recruit and facilitate for co-creation. Communities—especially when they are protected from public view and facilitated to bring consumers, or employees and consumers, together in open dialogue—are one solution.  They are a Petrie dish for experimentation, a safe place where companies can fail quickly and accelerate the learning curve, and in them the predominant emotion is happiness, not fear*.

*I can say this because I have actually counted “emotion” words in our communities…. Ah, the wonders of text analytics!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Please Ask Responsibly

Communispace is in the business of listening; it’s what we do. The answers we get, and consequently give our clients aren’t always the answers they hoped for – but they are answers. Here’s the tricky (and at times sticky) part: ensuring a question is asked for an answer, not just a confirmation of a pre-existing thought. True listening means being brave enough to listen to the last thing you wanted to hear; no small task.

The converse of this phenomenon was exemplified (and amplified) by the 2009 Miss USA pageant. The typically benign ball reached a raucous level when a single question, offered by celebrity blogger and pageant judge Perez Hilton, sparked a national controversy.

Communispace is in the business of listening; it’s what we do. The answers we get, and consequently give our clients aren’t always the answers they hoped for – but they are answers. Here’s the tricky (and at times sticky) part: ensuring a question is asked for an answer, not just a confirmation of a pre-existing thought. True listening means being brave enough to listen to the last thing you wanted to hear; no small task.

The converse of this phenomenon was exemplified (and amplified) by the 2009 Miss USA pageant. The typically benign ball reached a raucous level when a single question, offered by celebrity blogger and pageant judge Perez Hilton, sparked a national controversy.

Miss California Carrie Prejean“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”

The answer from San Diego Christian College student, Miss California Carrie Prejean, stayed true to her belief system as she suggested marriage is best between a man and a woman.

A public lynching, compliments of an enraged Perez ensued. The comment was the talk of Twitter, *bleeps* were introduced in national news interviews, covering colorful descriptors Perez lobbed at Prejean. As Perez has suggested (on repeat), “she should have been better prepared to answer that question.”

Was it lack of preparation – or did he just not like her answer?

Step outside the argument for a moment, there’s a lesson to be learned for brands bold enough to listen: don’t ask the question if you’re not prepared to accept the answer.

On to the Friday fun. Today’s double dose of delightful digs is designed to deliver a desire to laugh, talk and of course, play. After all, it’s the weekend – what’s there to worry about?

3 Responses to “Please Ask Responsibly”

  1. Julie C. says:

    I agree with your post, and all this attention surrounding Miss California is beyond ridiculous. It is hypocritical to attack someone for stating an opinion that you believe is closeminded, especially if they are simply answering a question. Perez Hilton is acting as though she committed a hate crime! His scathing remarks on his website toward celebrities for being overweight, unattractive, etc. are far worse! He should stick to drawing phallic symbols on celebrities instead of being a guest on Larry King Live! It is the differences in opinions that keep our political system running, and Mr. Hilton should recognize that!

  2. Gretchen says:

    Poor girl; I guess she just learned that it’s not ok to have an opinion. I’m sure Perez thought that being from California, it was the perfect question for her and he’d get the answer he wanted.

    After all this madness, it’s just one big publicity stunt for him. The follow-up “I apologize,” “no wait, I should’ve called her worse” is total agony. I can’t wait for the news cycle to run its course with this one and move on already.

  3. Alan says:

    Brilliant marketing? What if we find out that The Donald was a force behind all of this and has been driving his people to make the pageant edgier? Could this be a situation where asking that question was a well-thought out scheme and will end up being the lead for next year’s pageant? (I can already see the commercials with Carrie vs Perez) From a brand standpoint, I’ve been wondering lately if more marketers are working to create controversy as a strategy to get our short attention. You wrote about Burger King just recently Rocky and I was thinking the same thing about their campaign.

Leave a Reply

Read more

Quiet – the World is Changing

The past year – particularly the past 6 months – have been an economic and emotional disaster.
Perhaps you’ve heard about it?
The loss of wealth, jobs, homes and stability is dramatically challenging everything consumers believe. Formerly bedrock notions about life and dreams and pursuing aspirations are crumbling.

The past year – particularly the past 6 months – have been an economic and emotional disaster.
Perhaps you’ve heard about it?
The loss of wealth, jobs, homes and stability is dramatically challenging everything consumers believe. Formerly bedrock notions about life and dreams and pursuing aspirations are crumbling.
(Remember the good, old days when there was actually a thing called ‘disposable income’?)
David Kamp, in his excellent essay on the American Dream in the April issue of Vanity Fair, writes “…the time has come to consider the idea of simple continuity…where the standard of living remains happily constant from one generation to the next.”
Constant?
What, you mean, like, flat?
Seriously? Seriously?
For a country whose entire cultural psyche is practically based on the notion that anyone can grow up to be President or have Hollywood discover you in a drugstore or write a song in your basement that goes to #1 or magically (or chemically) turn into a professional athlete, the promise of continuity sounds a lot like giving up.
Hell, it doesn’t even sound like America.
Like, I’m sorry, when did we move to Chechnya?
But these are the kinds of notions that are being floated, discussed and otherwise batted around out there in consumerland, my friends.
So if ever there was a time when consumer companies needed to get close to their customers – and stay there – it’s right now.
All of us – agencies, marketing folk, researchers – need to start encouraging, enabling, facilitating and participating in the current consumer conversation. Because out of this we are going to discover the new realities of consumer behavior – as well as new, possibly even radical rules about what consumers want from the companies and brands they choose to invite into their changed and challenging lives.
And figuring out how to navigate these uncharted waters of changing consumer attitudes is going to require some care. A false marketing note in an up economy might be viewed as an annoyance – a false note in the current environment could quickly and irrevocably tag a company as insensitive, opportunistic or worse.
Finding the answers is absolutely critical.
But the good news is, we don’t have to guess.
Even in the midst of the swirling economic and emotional challenges that are transforming everything they know – consumers will tell us.
If we’re respectful and attentive, they will tell us how to speak to them, engage with them, interact with them in this new day and age.
To paraphrase Freddie Highmore in the film August Rush “The [answers] are all around us. All you have to do…is listen.”

One Response to “Quiet – the World is Changing”

  1. Jay

    We in the UK creative industries have been making a start on some new business models for the new economy.

    Check out we20 and a post I wrote tying that into some of my own ideas about how ‘bottom up’ initiatives in our industry could preserve jobs and set us up for survival and future growth.

    http://creativeagencysecrets.com/2009/04/01/we20-for-creative-industries-join-us/

    Rebecca

Leave a Reply

Read more

Chicken Little The Sky Is NOT Falling.

Sharpen your pitchfork, there’s a Populist party forming. This particular uprising, which actually features more Peace than pistols, is a natural (or inevitable, still not sure which) backlash for the notorious negativity flooding the news of late.

The economy is in peril. We get it

Sharpen your pitchfork, there’s a Populist party forming. This particular uprising, which actually features more Peace than pistols, is a natural (or inevitable, still not sure which) backlash for the notorious negativity flooding the news of late.

The economy is in peril. We get it.

But it appears audiences from coast-to-coast are crying ‘Uncle’. NPR answered copious calls from listeners for a break from the bleak, the bad, and the banking with their introduction of a ‘No Gloom, No Doom’ segment, now a regular feature of All Things Considered.

Meanwhile, Brian Williams and the cast of NBC Nightly News followed suit, dedicating a weekly segment to spotlighting individuals who have shown “random or regular acts of kindness in a cruel economy.

Would either news outlet have shrugged off their shroud of sad had their audiences not raised their collective voice? We’ll never know, but kudos to both for pushing Armageddon aside in favor of focusing, however briefly, on the brighter side of life. Power to the positive.

Those of you new to the Friday Song, welcome. This guarantees no matter how your week started, it finishes in fine fashion. While genres and artists change weekly, hopefully the positive impact on your mood stays the same.

So with that, we kick off April with some childlike enthusiasm. Enjoy!

2 Responses to “Chicken Little The Sky Is NOT Falling.”

  1. Dominic says:

    I have been watching the segment on NBC Nightly News and I think it has a positive affect on people. Specifically it inspires those that have to “give back” or help others that don’t and that has a bigger affect on the economy than people give it credit for. Ben Stein said in a cometary on Sunday Morning a few months ago that if those of us that have money right now not horde it and help create economic flow it will go a long way to increase consumer spending, sales, etc. and therefore elevate the general good feeling on wall street, which lets face it, is all based on speculation/rumors and “general feelings”. Though I don’t think that this will solve the current economic mess but it will certainly make life a little less gloomy for the general public in many ways that it won’t necessarily get credit for.

  2. Julie says:

    I could not agree more! Nice work – looking forward to future commentary. :-)

Leave a Reply

Read more

So Sadie, What’s your Status?

So I’m in Florida for my mother’s 80th birthday, sitting at the pool, in a definitely unprofessional frame of mind. My brother, daughter, husband, and nieces are engaged in a boisterous handstand contest, and I’m reading my mystery one sentence at a time. Mostly I’m listening to my mother schmooze with her neighbors.

So I’m in Florida for my mother’s 80th birthday, sitting at the pool, in a definitely unprofessional frame of mind. My brother, daughter, husband, and nieces are engaged in a boisterous handstand contest, and I’m reading my mystery one sentence at a time.  Mostly I’m listening to my mother schmooze with her neighbors. 

 “How’s the hip?” she asks Phyllis.

By the pool

By the pool

Phyllis shrugs in resignation – no words needed. “And you, were you able to get your money back on those sheets?” she counters. “I mean seconds are one thing, but ripped, that’s another.”

 

Others from the building wander by and cluster in small groups in and out of the pool. They’re showing off visiting grandchildren, commiserating about the building’s management, inquiring into one another’s health, recommending books, talking politics. The faces are wrinkled, one person’s body stick thin, another as folded as an origami housedress, but the conversation across the board is lively and the laughter earthy.

 

Most of these people in their 70s and 80s read and occasionally send email – corny jokes that circle the snowbird circuit with blinding speed. They conduct searches and are valiantly struggling to understand Facebook (which is, as one lady explains, “a way to keep track of what your grandchildren are up to.”)  But Twitter is something they can’t begin to fathom. And listening to these conversations, recognizing the comfort that I derive from knowing that my recently widowed mother is in such good company, I understand why.

All of this banter and warmth and casual but ultimately revealing conversation is driven by questions. How’s the hip? Did you see Obama last night? What did you think of Slumdog? Nobody here is broadcasting or soliloquizing; everyone is inquiring.  And that simple, solicitous human interest is the most powerful form of social media. It carries richer “data” – concern, interest, empathy – and yields more measurable results – a sense that you matter. This is organic community at its finest; and when we’re lucky enough to achieve this same dynamic in the online communities that we build, those are the days I most feel that what I do matters.

But right now, what matters most is to prove to my assembled family that when it comes to underwater excellence, I still reign. So …. Blackberry off.

 Over and out.

2 Responses to “So Sadie, What’s your Status?”

  1. James Colvin says:

    I actually think Twitter is a great platform to inquire. By asking a question, you can receive answers from numerous people, and by utilizing hashtags, you can join an even larger conversation about a given topic. I think one of the reasons Twitter has gotten as big as it has is it’s a great platform for people to share information and learn, not just to broadcast what you’re doing right now.

  2. Julie Wittes Schlack says:

    Thanks for your response, James. I agree that Twitter is a great way to pose a question and hear responses from a lot of people. The challenge is in knowing how to interpret those responses. Are the Tweeters typical of your target customers? Maybe, maybe not, but absent sustained, long-term engagement with them, it’s tough to know. And while they may be able to give you a quick thumbs up/thumbs down on something, I don’t think that 140-character installments are optimal for obtaining deep insight into emotions, habits, unmet needs, etc. So while I agree that Twitter is indeed useful, I see its value as more of a marketing tool — a way to quickly and broadly spread a message — than as an insights-generation tool. And in my experience, the best tweets are those that link to blogs, forums, and other formats where the anatomy and evolution of a conversation is more evident and sustained.

Leave a Reply

Read more

All Media is Social, aka Your Customers are People too

Recently, at the MTLC Social Media cluster meeting, Brian Haven, recovering Forrester analyst and now aspiring entrepreneur, made a terrific, thought-provoking presentation. The first part of the presentation showed how the online behaviors that we call social media today are actually things people have been doing for a very long time, in some cases since the beginning of time!

Recently, at the MTLC Social Media cluster meeting, Brian Haven, recovering Forrester analyst and now aspiring entrepreneur, made a terrific, thought-provoking presentation.  The first part of the presentation showed how the online behaviors that we call social media today are actually things people have been doing for a very long time, in some cases since the beginning of time!

Think cave art = early Flickr

  • Sharing
  • Connecting
  • Opining
  • Broadcasting
  • Creating

I thought this construct was so interesting because underlying it is the idea that successful social media efforts are just ways to help people express themselves in innately human ways – albeit with a technology spin. So when companies are looking to understand and connect with their customers, I think it’s important to remember that we are all just humans – and if we aren’t designing and interacting with customers in ways that recognize that, celebrate it in fact, these efforts will likely fail.  After all, this approach might lead to uncovering the important emotional connections and storytelling that builds great brands.

How does your company get human?

One Response to “All Media is Social, aka Your Customers are People too”

  1. I had this exact same thought. Last month, I happened to catch a late night rerun of “Sex in the City” and realized that in every episode, Carrie starts writing her column on her PC with a provocative question and ends the session with a conclusion and often a second provocative question. Unconsciously, that is how I write my blogs today…..who knew that Carrie’s column was an early blog

Leave a Reply

Read more